Why say it Is it a good movie? I replied to a netizen. A
good movie is for both refined and popular tastes.
Popular, it is a horror movie. There are not many flaws in the plot, and the production and cutting are very beautiful. If you don’t watch half of it, you don’t want to watch it.
Has this film been vulgar? Look at other film reviews. Many people say that the filming is good, and they all talk about it from the level of “vulgarity”, so I won’t spend too much time repeating it. Yes.
Ya. Every movie, every detail is deliberately made by the director and actors through their brains. There is no coincidence. Every feature, every lighting, the director is trying to express something. So, you can't just focus on the plot. Comment on a movie. This is no different from reading a novel. The reason why a movie is a movie is that it is different from a novel literature carrier because it is two different things. You have to ask more about a certain voice, a certain expression, a certain A shot, what does it mean and why?
Well, there is too much bullshit, let’s get into the theme.
Ya, the concept is that the director wants to convey something through the movie. It is to read the article in junior high school and summarize a central idea. If the article is lazy If the article is good, it means that the author behind it has something to tell everyone. The same is true for the movie.
I said that this film is good, but what is so good about it?
In fact, the director has something to say.
Applying Nietzsche’s A philosophical concept "the existence of the world is abstracted by you"
is relatively simple in terms of plot.
From the "vulgar" level, many people are talking about how the mirror has ghosts.
Is there really a ghost?
The story of my brother being caught in a police car finished?
First of all, bystanders, the police and others, accept without the influence of a mirror that the father killed the mother and the son killed the father. It's that simple. In
the end we see that the sister is also dead. The brother gets into the police car.
Why can't it be said that the subject of the story is the younger brother?
The whole plot we see is seen through the eyes of the younger brother. (If the director is low-level, the whole story is described with the eyes of the elder sister, and the younger brother will die in the end. Is the whole story complete? Isn't it easier to say such a horror movie at a superficial level? It's as simple and rude as the Italian "Record to the Ghost"?)
In the eyes of the younger brother, "Mom is evil. Dad is also evil and kills Mom." I had no choice but to kill my father. My sister died of evil."
And the reason for everything is that there is a ghost in the mirror.
Look at the poster of this movie.
Cover your eyes with your hands.
Could it be that the younger brother has a ghost in his heart and mistakenly thought that his father killed him Mom, then killed my dad, and then killed my sister? Then I blame the ghost in the mirror?
I only watched this movie once in the cinema, so I can't remember the details, so I don't dare to list it. So everyone will read it when you have time Take a look. I guess there must be details that make this logic work for me. The
reason why this film is good is more than that.
Think about it. After the audience finishes watching, 80% of the audience will say, oh, it's just a There are ghosts in the mirror.
Look at it again, if my logic of "there is a ghost in my brother's heart:, there is no ghost in the mirror" can work. Think about it.--------->Is it right? Most of the audience after watching this film thought that there was a ghost in the mirror? Is it "eyes covered?"
oculus----> the meaning of eyes.
Sister's eyes, brother's eyes, the audience's eyes?
So it's good Film.
Let's discuss and discuss.
(I say this today, there is actually a reason. Everyone has seen the painted skin. I personally think the painted skin is a bad movie. But it was a hit. When I watched the first one---the background of the knife fight in the desert The music is incoherent. It means that the production is bad. There are many loopholes in the film. So I think it is a bad film. But another senior movie fan said it is a good film. Well, star, the actual film is bad. It was deliberately created such a concept. This is the painted skin, and the whole movie is the painted skin. But I didn't refute: Chow Xingchi's comedy films made by this director Chen Jiashang before were all shallow films , has no high level. Could it be that he has practiced for so many years?) So I think that if a director is really a director who can appreciate both the refined and the common without any flaws, it is a perfect film.
Let me give a few examples: Director Zhao Benshan's film- --- vulgar ---- vulgar is not good, there are many low-level flaws.
So this kind of film, 2 points.
General director, Chen Kaige-----commercial film, selling, can watch. There is no level. 5 points
cattle The director of the point, Jiang Wen----The sun also rises such a literary film, I can only say that it is elegant and a little vulgar. Many people can't understand it. It is not a hit, but the director's cultivation has reached a level
. A little bit of bullshit, bullets fly --- there are both elegant and popular, but it is obviously still a little more elegant. He has practiced better. 9 points.
The best film and good director---The killer is not too cold, OCULUS, Forrest Gump. The first time I watched it, it was beautiful. The second time I saw what the director was saying, it was beautiful. The third time I saw the connection between my world and the movie, it was beautiful. 10 points
, so I give this film 10 points.
In horror movies , There is actually such a director (maybe there has been, but I'm timid and don't watch horror movies very much..))
Everyone criticizes what they say is wrong.
View more about Oculus reviews
