In my opinion, this is not a masterpiece, but it is a miracle. The first half is full of the director's many satires on the film circle and even existing social phenomena. Too obvious satire makes me feel that the director is a little out of control. As far as the structure of this film is concerned, only if the metaphor is sufficiently subtle can it be considered a god. When I entered the spiritual world in the second half, I couldn't understand it. If I didn't understand it from the beginning, I wouldn't try to find the logical point of this movie. Suddenly, if the plot didn't follow the normal logic, I couldn't find the north. It means that the purpose of the spiritual world is to make people unable to find the north, if this is a victory, as a movie watcher, Diou is also a lost bird.
The ultimate PK of the spiritual world and the material world. Nowadays, it seems that the satisfaction of our desire to pursue material existence is marked with the label of worshipping money, while the satisfaction of desire to pursue the spiritual world is mostly labeled with the petty bourgeoisie. When spiritual pursuits transcend basic material satisfaction, that is, when one can do whatever one wants, people have no human characteristics, and the material thing can be discarded, so what is the meaning of the skin? This problem has suddenly become high, and I don't want to.
View more about
The Congress reviews
