Jedburgh, he is the clearest person in the movie, and because of this, he is also the most tangled one. He is not as determined to take revenge as Craven, nor as bad and thorough as the villain. There is a dialogue between the two protagonists. Jedburgh seems to say: it is better for him to have no daughter than to have a daughter but lose a daughter. Craven's answer is probably: it is better to have once. I think that's what shook Jedburgh, all he had was the shrewdness to cover up the ugliness for the powerful and the politicians, and his life had no justice, no people, no country, nothing to match his ingenuity. In the end, after he calmly shot the group of politicians, he calmly let go of the young policeman, and looking at his fallen back, he finally became a person who "used to have", a bad guy who was attached to justice.
I suddenly wondered, if there is a person who has done a lot of evil in real life, will you forgive him for doing a certain good thing? It's a difficult question to explore, but I might forgive it!
View more about
Edge of Darkness reviews