limited by subject

Eriberto 2022-03-24 09:02:24

I finally finished watching Cage's film with patience, and I felt very fortunate after that. At that time, I was more rational and didn't buy this film. This film, d9,

as the title suggests, reflects the 9/11 terrorist attack. The record is changed, and it is embodied in the description at the beginning and the subtitles at the end of the film, but unfortunately,

it is too limited by these records, so that this film now seems to be a film similar to a documentary but not as good as a documentary. It's a documentary, because it's too loyal to those memories after the event, or because the subject matter is not easy to imagine. In short, it gives people a dry and chewy feeling. From the beginning, the whole film has a small family atmosphere. Most of the shots are conversations, conversations between the two trapped people, with conversations in memory mixed in, conversations, conversations, and conversations, mostly boring conversations. I think if I didn't stick to these, I could simulate the spectacular scene of loading the World Trade Center from the plane completely according to the CG at that time, which would shock people, and then bring some moving, and then the perception of truth, goodness and beauty. Or speaking of rescue, it can also be the people headed by Cage to rescue people, not to be stuck there tastelessly, but to arouse everyone's sympathy through dialogue. In fact, it is completely understandable. After all, 911 is a sensitive topic, and we need to take care of the public's psychology, but since it is already a movie, there should be some interesting processing.

And it’s not as good as a real documentary. If it’s a panoramic documentary, at least you can see the whole picture, including the speeches of the two sides, but the film is boring. When I saw Bush’s speech, I felt it was much more exciting than

the film itself. So many, two specific examples
1. If you think that this is based on a real person, you can understand that it may be that after Cage was rescued, he learned that the marine who found them was actually a non-staff person, and he came at a risk that he could not need. Makes people a little moved. But in the movie, there is a sequence of narration. The soldier was talking in the church and talking to himself, as if the rescuers who were already on the scene were all wine bags and rice bags, and there are indeed some photos in the later films. This way of thinking is a bit too personal. From the rescue point of view, this is the result of a collective rescue, although I am very curious why so many people gather outside, and then carry people out like a relay, do they all spread out and let a few strong guys spread their feet to transport them out? Can it be faster? They have serious injuries and cannot afford to delay

. 2. The whole film should reflect that although we have encountered misfortune, we can overcome it as long as we have faith and courage, but the final subtitle of the film shows that thousands of people were killed. n Many people were trapped, only more than 20 were rescued. What's the point of this? When you were about to sublimate the theme, you typed it like this. Are you saying that rescue is not good? Anyway, when I saw this, I thought of the subtitles of the Titanic. How many people were killed, only a few ship back

View more about World Trade Center reviews

Extended Reading
  • Evangeline 2021-12-26 08:01:13

    There are only 20 people.

  • Constantin 2022-03-25 09:01:11

    Boring movie, Cage really went downhill

World Trade Center quotes

  • Donna McLoughlin: You can't leave yet, the kitchen isn't even finished yet.

    John McLoughlin: Will you forget about the kitchen for a minute. I'm kinda stuck here.

    Donna McLoughlin: Well get unstuck John.

  • John McLoughlin: We prepared for everything. Not for this. Not for something this size. There's no plan.