I have seen Frankenstein's ontology movie before, and I think this guy is a very deep character, whether it is the character himself or the background at the time. By this film, Frankenstein is simply a dancer's stick undead. In today's era, in this era of contention among a hundred schools of thought, there are Wolverine, Captain America, Thor, Superman, etc., Frankenstein, if you throw away your literary skin, you really don't want to fight them with anything.
In addition, the shape of the demons is very uncreative, especially the prince of the demons, his face is longer than that of the clansmen after transformation, and there is almost no difference. The biggest flaw is that the male protagonist drew two horizontal and one vertical on the Demon King, and he took him away. My God, the demons in the exorcist are not so easy to deal with, okay? After all, you have some status in hell, right? Is it because you draw a cross and don't have as many strokes as this symbol? So less powerful? The only good thing is that after the death of the demon, it is very beautiful, but this also has to remind me of the vampire after the death of the blade fighter.
Finally, my favorite "Night Dragon" is really exactly the same as the night I watched when I was a child, and some settings are the same. It is a stone statue during the day and can only be moved at night. I remember watching this animation at the beginning, there is a scene I still remember now, a stream-of-consciousness battle between the night dragon and a villain wearing a red dragon power armor, deeply impacted my young soul,,,, at that time my eyes The animation here is the shell and eva in the eyes of the otaku. In other words, it is better to leave the male protagonist and remake the animation.
View more about I, Frankenstein reviews