This reminds me of the Wikipedia explanation of the term "Australia lost its innocence days", which is also a mystery, but not as bizarre or as artistic as the movie describes it. Did Will refer to this case back then?
As for the descriptions of sexual repression written by film critics, I don't think they should pay attention to them. Film is a manifestation of art, just like painting; some are realistic, so everyone can understand it; but Some of them are abstract works, there must be a group of people who can't understand them, and most people will definitely curse in private: shit! But you can't deny that works like Van Gogh are rare indeed.
I used to remember that there was a preview of this film on the top of the potato. I thought the trailer was very nice: the ending was already given, and no one knew where the girls went? Who took them away? But when you watch the beginning of the film, you still have the idea to explore the problem. This is just like Hitchcock used the same method in "Rear Window", as if we are the masters in the film, immersive . Take this picture, then you can't deny that it really has something special.
Don't be fooled by appearances, horror films should be full of ghosts and blood; suspense films should have questions and answers. If the director does answer the question, it's like magic: fun, but not necessarily classic.
View more about Picnic at Hanging Rock reviews
