. Mr. Benny is a male god. Boom, after watching it for a while, I can't come out at all.
First of all, the speed of the accent and the use of words are difficult to understand. I even watched two movies that day, both with an Australian accent. The Australian accent is not very strange. It seems that the pronunciation part is relatively backward. It is not as round as the English accent, and it is not as smooth and undulating as the American accent. It's so long that I don't understand it at all.
Then, there are too many special effects. . . I still like realistic documentaries, oh, I watched this movie as a documentary. Although I know that there is a big gap between the film and the reality, I think the director and screenwriter will try to disguise it as a documentary. In the end, it turned into a science fiction film without first arriving, but that's fine, knowing that the story told is not a real story, but deceiving the audience into saying that this is the truth, then it will really be criticized. This film is also self-aware. When will WikiLeaks be made into a documentary? I guess it will never be possible. I really want to watch a documentary like the encyclopedia. I have
read other film reviews. Most of them say that the narrative is messy and people can’t understand. I admit it's quite messy, but it's not too hard to understand. The most chaotic place is the first half of the film, the part where Daniel has not been fired, Assange is gathering intelligence everywhere. In fact, I think the audience can't understand what Assange is doing, because the whole movie is narrated from Daniel's point of view, most of which are Daniel's psychological activities and confessions, and the audience can see the various original intentions relatively clearly. But the protagonist of the whole film is Assange, and the whole film tries to interpret Assange. The audience can't see the complete Assange from Daniel's perspective. Although he has many confessions in the film, it is far from enough, and he does not explain his motives clearly. What the audience wants to see is not "Assange". What kind of person is Qi?"
It is feasible to observe the protagonist from the perspective of a bystander. Sherlock Holmes's original novel is composed from Watson's perspective, and the entire novel is Watson's diary. Maybe something can be learned from there. Ah, I haven't read Sherlock Holmes's original book yet. What should I do? I don't seem to like the characters in the original book, because I don't seem to like Conan Doyle, an author whose views are very different from mine. He wrote No matter how I thought about the book that came out, I felt that it should not be in my taste. . . But even if you want to learn to tell the story from a bystander's point of view, you should watch
Lord Assange's claim that this movie is propaganda. I didn't believe it at first. It stands to reason that Americans do not like to shoot a single person against the whole government. Well, liberating information gives people freedom of information. This kind of film should be very popular. But I forgot that although the United States has filmed many scenes of bombing the White House and killing the president, those movies are very far from reality. It is impossible for a heavy plane to bomb the White House directly, and the president will not always be kidnapped. Taking a step back and saying that even if there is a murder and the person who can replace the president can be ranked tenth, those disaster movies and action movies have no practical significance. But this one is acting out what happened the year before. Even if the entire film has rolling subtitles "This story is purely fictional", most audiences will still take the plot of the film as fact
. In this era, the influence of movies and TV on people is huge, and Assange must have thought of this long ago. The media cannot be trusted. The
script was changed based on Daniel's autobiography and another person's biography about Assange. , how much do they know? No one knows the facts at all, everyone can tell you the stories they see, and if you want to know the facts, you have to find them. Even the Records of the Grand Historian, China's greatest history book, is considered to contain a lot of exaggeration and Sima Qian's own views, let alone any biography.
Assange has seen the script for a long time, and this film really made him a neurotic ~
paranoid, sensitive, sharp, restless, cold-blooded, selfish, unsympathetic, defiant, and unable to take care of himself. Although it can't be regarded as a smear, and there is no obvious responsibility for him, people who have watched the movie will feel that he is a person with "serious personality defects".
The description of him in the movie is that maybe he is both a genius and justice, but he is definitely a lunatic
, hehe, it is very likely that if he is not crazy, he is not a devil
. Mr. Benny's acting skills are really wonderful.
In the end, there was a confession, should it be said to be an imitation? You can find Assange's original version on youtube, and compare it with the movies. It's extremely similar, but it's not a complete imitation. It should be exaggerating and beautifying Assange. How to handle this paragraph always feels that it should be thought by Benny himself. Compared with other parts of the movie and even himself, Assange in this paragraph is not so "crazy", and some pauses are omitted and shortened, but it is more calm and wise. Not wanting to be as intermittent as the original Assange. The last paragraph is really amazing
!
My language is so poor, I can't describe Benny's performance at all. It is really faithful to the original version just right, and at the same time, it adds what my own soul
always says, and gives soul to the color, which sounds very nonsense and empty. But it really is. The characters all contain a part of the actor, and even if the character looks completely different from the actor, as long as he plays the part alive, there must be a magical commonality between them.
Benny is an actor, but like many other British actors, he is a scholar. He can quote Shakespeare's famous words casually, and say that he recommends this book. He recommends classical literature without pretence and introduces Datong. After he spoke about Assange, he paid more attention to news politics, so he showed three pieces of paper to the reporters who followed him: don't follow me, go to Egypt, report useful things, and question why the British government There is no reasonable explanation for their mistakes.
An actor, a star, who dares to care about politics and has a political stance, you really don't want to mess with it [On the consequences of chasing a good male god: male god, let's discuss the situation in Egypt]
As a documentary, the Fifth Ladder is completely inadequate. As a drama film, which aroused the public's interest in WikiLeaks and Assange, so as to know more about them, the fifth ladder plot is very bland and unattractive. As a commercial film, it received a lot of attention due to the addition of Benny, but the box office was very bleak.
It's not a good movie anyway, but you should watch him. At least you can realize that just having a good actor is not enough to support a movie.
This movie is of great significance to Benny's career. The male god is so beautiful~ 嘤~
View more about The Fifth Estate reviews
