I haven't finished reading the original autobiography, and I know the general context of the film's story from dropping out of school until the birth of the iMac (the iPod only appeared for a few minutes at the beginning of the film). The largest part in the middle is the garage phase of founding Apple and then the plot of Steve's constant battle with shareholders and the board of directors. Personally, I think the film might as well be called "How to Fight Wisdom and Brave with Board Shareholders in Difficulties". From the perspective of the plot arrangement, it is too straightforward and lacks climax, and several key points are not well highlighted, such as: how he conveys his ideas is very little, and his investment in product research and development is only scratchy, after he returned to Apple Milestone products are barely mentioned. It feels a bit like driving a high-end off-road vehicle and crashing all the way on the highway.
From the perspective of the actor's interpretation, Kutcher's face is still seven-point similar, and his acting skills are really average. Or, the script didn't give much opportunity to portray Steve's qualities. The only few conflicts between the main characters are in the part of opening people and being opened by people. There are a few warm clips, and there are no big ones (such as with girlfriends) that are a bit redundant. The friendship of the founding team and the split between the later openings have a lot of ink.
The soundtrack, the scene, and the lighting are all pleasing to the eye. Biographical films personally value the character building of the main characters, and whether the focus of major events and conflicts between characters is distinguished from the indifferent plot of the running account. Apparently this movie does a good job of it.
For a legend like Steve, it takes 120 minutes to perform wonderfully, but it is still objective and realistic not to have too much hope and expectation.
View more about Jobs reviews
