Chinese people have become accustomed to Western terms for what happened in 1453: "The Destruction of Byzantium" and "The Fall of Constantinople". However, in the eyes of the Turks, this is a "conquest", and it is a matter of course. If you are backward and I am strong, I will conquer you. Otherwise, there will be no Istanbul today? Perhaps this is a kind of thinking that glorifies aggression, but it is also historically objective, and Rome was also conquered by the Germans, wasn't it? As for the last Muhammad II, like a saint, he picked up the child and promoted freedom of belief. It is indeed a bit too much. However, it cannot be denied that if it were not for Mohammed II, the Orthodox Church might have disappeared, the High Priest of Constantinople could survive, and the Orthodox Church could continue to exist throughout Greece and Eastern Europe. It's a feat, just not as described in the movie.
As far as the plot is concerned, it's a bit cliché and the characters are facialized. The Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine is not so wretched, and the male protagonist feels like the hero who angered the red flag.
Finally, the girls are very beautiful and have big breasts, and Turkish men are very sexual.
Of course, I have a neutral opinion on any religion. The Islam, Orthodox, and Catholicism in the film all have their own advantages and disadvantages.
View more about Conquest 1453 reviews
