In fact, the film has already hinted at this (the way his girlfriend died is completely different, it has already proved the existence of parallel space, when they went back to the past, they did not go to the park, the robbers who already existed in the park will inevitably give another passerby there. The family causes tragedy, and the coachman will also feel guilty for his girlfriend who died in the car accident, affecting his life. Due to the butterfly effect, the future will inevitably change).
But because the male protagonist firmly believes that after one failure, it means that every time he saves his girlfriend, he will die. How could it possibly be found? ? ? Because he was wrong in the first place.
I screamed in my heart: that was really just a coincidence! Save it again and it won't hang up!
In the end, he never went back, and he went straight to the future, which made people speechless.
Such a smart person doesn't even think about it, if the past can't be changed, it is impossible for him to exchange a word with his past girlfriend, otherwise, even if he communicates a little bit, it will be considered a change. Could it be that the director just wants to create an image of an extremely smart idiot for everyone to despise?
Lao Luo has spoken, and a wrong reasoning is doomed to not get the correct answer.
View more about The Time Machine reviews
