The director must have been drinking too much or taking too much medicine to make this eye-popping movie—in short, he was out of the game. The bluff all the way is quite serious, but at the final climax, he threw a big mouth of himself, which is really incomprehensible. Say you want to fight superstition, but at the end you stumble over the audience, overwhelm the audience, and go to the bottom, which is unconvincing; say you want to fight science, and the audience is ended by the textbook-level rumors that you occupy 9/10 of the entire movie. Even every scene full of "misleading" can make the audience turn to the side of science, so that the last so-called crucial 1/10 of the scene playback and the raving alone are so pale; then you have both sides. On the contrary - no kidding. At this time, you said that the film expresses people's struggles in their careers, their beliefs, and their self-recognition in life. After careful research, it seems to make sense, but compared with the uproar and confusion of the main audience, Who can easily find out? And they are expressed in such a bizarre and contradictory way, how many people can accept it? Although the atmosphere and methods of many bridges are well controlled, they can't highlight the theme floating in the thick fog. If this is an immature study of a certain student, it is understandable, but as a career, there is already "Buried Alive" For a director of such a masterpiece, it seems a bit overwhelming. In short, the immature and self-righteous approach of this film from the beginning to the end is surprising. Even though the preparations along the way are quite pompous, but in the end, it still ends up being vague and convoluted, at most, it is just fooling the audience.
View more about
Red Lights reviews