Who told me what this shot was about?, Reivew on [Rec]²

If the first part is immersive stimulation and enjoyment, then this one is completely self-inflicted!

The first one was released in 2007, this one is in 2009.

(It took two years to shoot such a film? In my opinion, it can be done in two days.)

So I have reason to believe that the director did not think about making a sequel when he made the first film, but the first film had box office, and there were Word of mouth, -- wouldn't I be sorry for the audience if I didn't make a sequel, and I'm even more sorry for the white money?

I thought that only China has filmmakers who have absolutely no morals and just want to make money. It turns out that there are so many in foreign countries.

Let's talk about this movie.

There is no plot, no camera, no editing, only 2b (the three who are going to release the inflatable doll), and the roar of the magic stick.

The plot of the film itself is based on extracting blood from the devil (actually loss) to develop an antidote.

But isn't this Nima seeking his own death? !

If the devil wants to mess up the world, the virus is not spread through the air, but the most primitive one - it spreads by biting you, then Nima has an antidote and an egg? !

Zombies are injected with super antibiotics, can they become human again? !

And the last episode, what the hell, that firewood stick pulled a bunch of stuff into the heroine's mouth?

View more about [Rec]² reviews

[Rec]² pictures