"The Substantiation of the Second Personality"

Laurine 2022-03-24 09:02:05

The reason for this title is because I don't think the idea of ​​split personality seems to convince me. If many plots are viewed in terms of "split personality", I will feel that unless male 1 and his other personality male 2 develop to the back, two people It only makes sense that the lattices become entities, not in the same body. The plots of gang committing crimes, passers-by A, B, C pulling their nails, attempted rape and other plots are all products of hypnosis. The male protagonist has already been hypnotized to kill the other four people, so there is no need to gain a "sense of security" again. And before the male protagonist told the female protagonist where to hide the painting, the female protagonist covered the bug. If it was alone, there was no need to do so, since she was under hypnosis. But I just think that if the second personality of the male lead appears after the female lead and the male lead 1 to steal pictures for her, then why would the female lead's hypnotic skills cause so many things. Although it is very simple and rude to think like this... But if you have to say that this film is a hypnotic documentary, there is nothing to say, you can be self-consistent, but I can't accept it. Another: At the end of the film, after the three people (let's say three people) entered the garage, the manager glanced at them, and then the camera also brought down the monitor. I was expecting passers-by to appear, but it seems that overhearted. (When the administrator saw them go in, the glass reflected two people, I think it was male 1 and male 2) Another point of confusion is that I saw a statement that when male 2 received the ipad (and "after"), he was hypnotized Well, I agree with this for the moment - the same courier, the same plot. But if male 1 and male 2 are two personalities of the same person, and the disappearance of male 1 and the existence of male 2, there is a reason for the female protagonist to hypnotize male 2 and let him choose whether to keep or leave his memory (the female protagonist lets male 2 choose have memories of the past two personalities). But if male 1 and male 2 are basically two people, I don't think male 2 needs to worry about whether to forget this memory (assuming I can see from the film that male 2 and female protagonist are in love), I think this is quite unreasonable. It's strange that the body was left rotten in the car and no one found it. Some people say that this is because it is in hypnosis, but if it is in hypnosis, male 1 thinks the passerby girl is his girlfriend, and he also puts the painting and passerby girl together, then the painting is just a "prop" in hypnosis. It doesn't make sense. And if the painting is an entity, killing a passerby girl is hypnosis, why can't the heroine know the location of the painting through the hypnosis she designed?

View more about Trance reviews

Extended Reading

Trance quotes

  • [first lines]

    Simon: [auctioneer is barking prices] There is a painting, it's by Rembrandt. 'Storm On The Sea Of Galilee', it's called, and he's in it. Old Rembrandt, he's in the painting. He's in there, right in the middle of the storm, looking straight at you. But... you can't see him. And the reason you can't see him is because the painting has been stolen.

  • Elizabeth: We keep secrets from lots of people, but most of all we keep them from ourselves. And we call that forgetting.