I suddenly realized that there would be many people who thought "5 Centimeters Per Second" was very hypocritical. I've watched this hypocritical film so many times. I always feel that the director expresses the subtle feelings very well, which resonates very well.
Reasoning like this: Am I a hypocrite? Or like hypocritical people?
Then I recalled the feelings in that film: first love, the sweetness and persistence of first love, secret love, the suffering and loss of secret love, the first love that died, the teenage lover who could never be forgotten no matter what, and what was lost in my heart after losing her A part, a part of others that can no longer be accepted, and thus the whole person affected, his cognition of some basic problems in life, his attitude towards life.
Probably all of the above, right? I can't say it well.
I think few people pay attention to love as much as Makoto Shinkai in "5 Centimeters Per Second". Rather, he focused on first love, a teenage love. One of the rarities is his attempt to describe how love affects a person through the consistent process of childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. The wonderful thing is not only that he believes that the child's heart is also mysterious (or do you think those two elementary school students are hypocritical?), but also that in the second paragraph, he sees through the eyes of a crush, a girl that teenager. The moment she finally understood, she said, she realized that confession was meaningless, because the boy had been looking at a distant place behind her. I think she is very close to him at this moment. The moment they looked at the soaring rocket together, they were very close.
Every time I listen to one more time, one more chance, I think of the feeling of the man who used to be a teenager walking alone in the city. Perhaps few men have similar thoughts and feelings, so I think he is special.
It seems to have written the wrong object.
Makoto Shinkai probably has an obsession and fascination with urban landscapes. urban plot?
He is so paranoid about the details of the city, probably because he saw the beauty of the city, so the city he described was beautified accordingly.
Xin Haicheng, who does not paint cities, is not like Xin Haicheng. Just like Hayao Miyazaki who doesn't paint forests and grasslands is not like Hayao Miyazaki.
Therefore, "The Garden of Words" is a typical Xin Haicheng work, and the setting and mood belong to the same type as "Second Speed".
However, in my opinion, the plot and the emotion expressed are not as good as "Speed of the Second". The plot is more vulgar or even vulgar. The bully incident in Japanese colleges and universities is already a rotten bridge. What did not disappoint me was that the mood of boys and girls was still interpreted and expressed by Makoto Shinkai. But this part is few and a little lacking.
But what is to be admired is the orgasm when the girl's emotions are vented. The climax of the whole article, great. The foreshadowing, development, and eruption of emotions are coherent, the screen arrangement is smooth, there are lines and stops, the voice actors are praised, and the soundtrack is praised.
So, as a result, I still watch this film many times over and over again.
Writing this still doesn't answer the question at the beginning. Actually no answer is needed. What it embodies is actually a truth: people are different, and they are very different. Just keep this fact in mind and the world will have a lot less problems.
View more about The Garden of Words reviews
