This is Martin's second film, the first one is Seven Neuropathies, from which I can see a lot of uncharacteristic movie performances, of course, these uncharacteristics are based on The narrative style that has been developed or that audiences rely on for joy and resentment, by breaking Hollywood commercial dramas, gangsters, violence and other mature dramas, ironically, thus showing a free will film form.
On the other hand, most of the mainstream movies we see now are already familiar with business routines. Usually, the plot structure has already been dismantled and reorganized by the drama, and the burdens, contradictions, conflicts, jokes and other settings have already taken their place. There is no future in the original work. Just put it together and put it in one by one according to the time period of the movie plot, and then you will be able to lead the audience's eyes and go.
Commercial movies, if you don't lead you to go, there will be no money to make, just like not slavery. People's minds can't control people. According to my personal observation, the major commercial works 3 years ago basically used a group of people in the plot (men, women, young and old, tall, short, fat, thin, clean and ugly) → put on some background (yesterday, today and tomorrow). The subject of acquired history, sci-fi and magic, usually it is very easy to write articles here and it is also the most attractive place. Nowadays, the imagination and ideas of writers can be described as heavenly and starry sky, such as the film of the ring messenger with new ideas but withered branches) → put on something Contradictions (here is nothing more than love, hate and hatred) → then set off towards a goal (of course, the agreed goal will eventually be reached no matter what happens in the middle),
since the first pornographic film more than ten years ago The success of the film has been like this until three or four years ago, and the audience is also very happy with it. There is no new idea. The audience is like a big wave of zombies walking forward with this and that. They are used to following the protagonist in the movie while talking about the plot. Looking down, my thoughts have long since become rigid, and watching a movie is no longer a process of feeling happy, but a process of making you happy by a blockbuster. This is quite sad, so there is a wonderful director like Martin.
Off-topic (what? You think of Jiang Wen again? Don't make trouble, people just choose the script and change it well, why do you think of Nolan again? Nolan's script is indeed well written and edited, but people can play Contradiction, which part of the Dark Knight trilogy is not the climax of playing a dangerous love choice? The difference is that in recent years, everyone has learned to sell things, such as designing a foreshadowing, pointing the way, and making a small talk. Interlude~, look at Inception, Mission Impossible 4, all kinds of good ideas and good cards, but people just don't follow the routine ~ I'll give you an agreement on how the plot will go, and then I won't go halfway along the way. Then it made you mentally tangled and nervous. In the end, you still didn't break the knot, and everyone was happy with the false alarm~, so it was said that you added a small link and still played the game) It
's a bit too much and a little far, But this is all a foreshadowing. The main thing is to say why this film was picked up by the Oscars in the first place, and what exactly was it about? Free movie viewing awareness, truly breaking the routine, intense but will not affect your thinking about problems, contradictions, and plot development, this is the key to impressive.
To analyze this film in the language of the conventional system, it seems impossible to start, because this film is different from ordinary films, it will have a seemingly good, bad, or successful ending, and there is no seemingly clear ending. The cause and effect make it difficult to clarify the boundaries between emotion and morality. Why is this? It is because the audience has long been accustomed to adapting to the needs of the plot. When a movie creates a bad guy, you have to hate the bad guy to the core, and when you create a tragedy, you feel unbearable. Just like at the beginning, the protagonists and others are so unfortunate and have a sad mood, so The audience also has sympathy, and at this time the director throws a feigned young man for you. Everyone knows that in that kind of occasion, you shouldn't talk about other people's misfortunes, and you shouldn't anger others, but why? Who stipulated it? What if you don't? If it were me, I wouldn't do such a stupid thing. The guy in the green shirt, who seemed rather uninterested, sang a different tune to show everyone what would happen.
After watching the seven neuroses, I searched for some things about Martin, and found that he also wrote a lot of interesting little stories, all of them are bizarre, but not unreasonable, the cause and effect are very subtle, just like this short film, To say it makes no sense, but it seems to have some truth, there are ethics, human accidents, grief, and enlightenment, but in general, it is still a satire of the frailty of human nature and the fragility of life. And use a kind of sarcasm.
In the film, a large number of contradictions are derived from the different expressions of understanding of human nature and views on life.
Understanding of human nature: Can't live without sadness when a person dies? Do some things have to be expressed in anger? Does being tall have anything to do with being short and being an equestrian? Does believing in God have anything to do with the dead? Does it matter when you buy alcohol or not? Do your mood swings have to follow the events around you? Let's discuss and discuss~ Why take it seriously, but some people are so serious, they make themselves uncomfortable, and they lose their temper at every turn. It's so uncomfortable. It's not the easiest and most straightforward way to live happily. The way of life? Wife died, isn't there still a rabbit? Does the child still have a wife? Can't you still have another one, what? Worried about psychological shadows when you give birth next time? So it's still your problem, isn't it a sudden death? It's not that you were killed by holding your child, this is what life should be like, the guy in the green shirt said that his mother is not the best woman, and we have to continue to live.
Life perspective: Since everything is destined, why bother yourself? Isn't it the same to go to the circus and ride a horse when we are born tall? It depends on what you are aiming at. If you like horse racing, go racing, but what if you simply like horses? Going to the circus is the same. This involves the issue of opinions. The details of the guy in green are the former point of view, and the protagonist is very likely to have the latter point of view, so the guy in green said that the protagonist’s answer doesn’t seem to work. The guy also thinks that the couple's child is not a sudden death, it must be killed by them, otherwise why is it so sad (there is no way that the boy's world outlook is too optimistic)? And the little brother who sells food on the train, who stipulates that you have to go back and forth to buy things? Do you think it is, I don't think so, the little brother still thinks that drinking in the morning is not good, so he made a sarcastic sentence until X o'clock in the morning, the protagonist is not happy, what time do I want to drink, what time does it affect you to sell alcohol? The child's father thinks that the boy in the green shirt is mentally retarded, but the protagonist doesn't think so (please pay attention to the words used in the conversation, you will find that everyone is extreme), the child's mother said that the child died suddenly, but the boy in green clothes just said It was killed by a crash. It seems that everyone has a dialogue, and they have distinct personalities and different starting points and viewpoints. At the same time, there are strong contradictions, which intensify the plot.
Until later, everyone might think it was the problem of the guy in the green shirt, but the director explained that the incident of the cow explosion affected the guy's worldview. In the eyes of ordinary people, a cow is about to die of bloating (flatulence can sneak into anger) , but a stranger came and happily went up and stabbed it a few times to help the cow deflate. The onlookers felt that they were saving the cow and expressed their welcome. The boy in green when he was a child saw it. He kept it in his mind, so he saw someone was angry and went to poke at that person like a stranger. It would definitely help that person to get rid of the discomfort. Even if it was bombed, everyone would at least have a good time~
(The director definitely agrees with children . Psychological, because his articles are full of children doing all kinds of weird things when they grow up due to the influence of adult events, satirizing the problem of adults ignoring or ignoring children's worldview.)
This reflects the growth problem of the boy in green At the same time, it also explained the deformed world view of growth and the possibility of causing mother-killing, but before the shootout, everyone may have a good impression of the reasonable, optimistic and broad-minded young man in green, which makes the audience feel regretful. The changes before and after completely let the audience Taking the position all over the place has a great influence on the emotional mobilization of the audience.
Finally, let's talk about the disadvantage, that is, the audience is very likely not to buy it when they watch this kind of film.
In the end, the protagonist committed suicide. I want to say it as a series event, that
is, God has no time to play tricks on you, because God has already written the script, you are just the actors in it, whether you want to die is not up to you , do you think two guns can kill more people? Laozi film makes you miss a single one, and tells you that 66 is not necessarily smooth! The person who jumped the car also decided to have today from birth!
that whoever! You don't believe in God, do you? good! Then I will let you taste all the joys and sorrows today!
Can any mortal in the world withstand such a blow?
The protagonist took the gun and went home to seek death, but God just didn't let him die.
If you don't follow Lao Tzu's way of acting, you will be rough on Lao Tzu!
And you don't believe it or not? The cow will explode too! (laughs, the sad person was teased a lot)
View more about Six Shooter reviews
