Seeing such a plot, I sighed and laughed, laughing and thinking
[Look at that, I have gotten along with such a patient, Mr. Interpol, I understand your suffering]
You can't understand the patient's meaningful and strange words, and you can't understand why the patient is Can't understand you, can't understand why she turns on the faucet, can't understand her occasionally normal side. All the incomprehensibility can only be attributed to her being ill, not the patient, the fault is the person who did not take good care of her. When self-blame and incomprehensible pain hit, endure it and endure it again, ignore the spinning washing machine and say let's go on a trip, moan in pain and fantasize about seeing the end of everything, rush out to find her who hasn't come home, promise She will definitely go on a trip, she walked quickly, turned off the washing machine, picked up the knife, and sent her, who thought she was on the trip, to the hospital.
Everything has shaped this strong detective, and for me this is the most thought-provoking part of this movie.
Then there are all kinds of weird places, weird bathtubs, weird laundry shops, weird Japan's first hypnosis video, weird X on the wall, weird abandoned buildings, weird Sakuma suicide, weird blurry photos, A strange tape, a strange Mamiya, a strange hypnotic ability, a strange X on the neck of a mentally ill wife, and a strange waitress with a knife.
If the theme of hypnosis is suggestion, and the theme of movies about hypnosis is suggestion, then yes, I accept it.
But I don't accept many people in the film critics say that the policeman inherited X's so-called ritual control nurse and killed his wife. He finished dinner with a red face and decent clothes, smoked a cigarette and drank coffee. The extension of the camera showed the policeman's satisfied expression. It's because he just controlled the waitress to kill. I don't accept such an ending. It doesn't make sense to me. It's just as unacceptable as an inexplicable fool Mamiya who easily hypnotizes and controls others to commit murder from the beginning to the end of the film.
I seek explanations, explanations for a more thorough and persuasive dissection of the film.
If someone pretends to tell me deeply, this is a movie, a movie is to ask questions, some good movies are to tell half a story and let the audience guess, and the open ending lets everyone think about it. Can.
I implore the original film critic to at least tell me what the plot of the abandoned building stands for, what the meaning of the abandoned building that pops up from the plot, and what is the purpose of the happy music at the beginning that has nothing to do with the rhythm of the movie, that opening music The scene with the water pipe murder at first made me think there would be some kind of dark humor in this movie.
If these questions are all mere insinuations of being engrossed into the plot of the movie, then I have to say that the insinuations succeeded, that I've gone into the mists of
using hypnosis to reveal the sins of human nature? The sin and nature of human nature is to want to kill and kill? Why do I think such an explanation is the most superficial? After all, it uses hypnosis, not even impulse. The seven deadly sins must be convicted by doing those things. If you think about them all, it's really distorted. The taste of fundamentalism.
Magical hypnosis, magic movie, magic Kurosawa
Kiyoan
eh? Is this over?
View more about Cure reviews
