Jesus in the film is depicted as a "superhero", and he gradually assumes the responsibility of transcending human beings in the choice of being a human being. Properties need to coexist, but not simultaneously. Just like Alan Moore's "Watchmen", we see so many questions and ironies, but they are all "human" wills. We say that Rorschach can't become Batman, and Doctor Manhattan is not Superman, but Jesus crucified But it is equivalent to asking "Clark Kent" of "Daily Planet" to do what "Superman" wants to do, not that it can't be done, but doing so will throw the concept out of balance.
So I secretly thought that this was the most sincere and true story of the sacrifice of Christ.
The so-called voluntary sacrifices are mostly forced step by step. And the happiness and redemption in front of him are nothing but the undoing of redemption in the mirror. Reminds me of what a Hong Kong film said at the end: those who obey the destiny. Sadness, those who resist the destiny. die. In the film, Jesus, who repented in the sea of fire, was nothing but a monkey grandson whose pipa bones were locked. After five hundred years, he folded his hands together, and he became enlightened. He said that I am a merciful Buddha.
Judge of all the earth, will he not do justice? For an individual, justice is just one random coin toss, and even if the overall trend is equality, it will not solve any problem in the individual. We are simply immersed in the torrent of group consciousness, and we push that torrent to overwhelm our former selves. This is called "God is with us" and that's why "God is always on our side". So all along, what we fight against and what we comply with is not the will of God, but the will of others. But the human heart is so arrogant and domineering, even if there is a "God" in the world, the "high above" will only be "us".
View more about The Last Temptation of Christ reviews
