First, make a brief summary of the entire crime plan. In the first step, the protagonist wants to kill the deceased because he is threatened by the deceased; in the second step, he designs a murder plan to kill the deceased without suspicion; in the third step, he observes that the prosecutor has seventeen signs of perjury; The fourth step, you can use the prosecutor's desperate desire to win the case through perjury to pave the way for your own gubernatorial campaign to get rid of the crime, and you can use this to become famous, kill three birds with one stone: kill the dead, avoid the crime, and become famous in one fell swoop ; The fifth step is to develop a detailed plan.
Now let’s discuss this well-planned plan: First, make it clear that the prosecutor will win the case by perjury by DNA; As evidence to accuse and thus finalize the case, once it is verified that the prosecutor's behavior is a procedural violation, the judgment is invalid, even if the murderer is really the same. Just as the privacy of a candid photograph cannot be used as direct evidence, a judgment reached through illegal means is invalid. Third, since this is the case, the protagonist plans to become the accused person, and then expose the prosecutor's perjury, so that he can legally not be the murderer, and by the way, he can become famous, and his ambitions are not small. Fourth, the problem is how to expose the prosecutor's perjury, which will lead to a series of subsequent acts. Made an appointment with a friend and bought a bunch of stuff. To explain a problem here, many people say it is unreasonable: how to explain the tooth marks that were bitten by dogs later. I gave an explanation. No one saw the dog bite at that time. What we, including the protagonist's friends, saw the picture after being bitten by the dog, so the tooth mark may have existed for a long time, and what the main character showed us was just the original tooth mark plus a new barking dog, pretending to be a new dog. biting. Fifth, let’s look at the relatively simple plan first. The protagonist kills, pretending to have nothing to do with reporters and friends who plan to expose the prosecutor’s crimes and conduct a series of shootings. The protagonist is accused of guilt by the prosecutor, and successfully causes the prosecutor’s perjury, and asks the friend to show the video Expose the prosecutor's crime and prove that you have nothing to do with it. It's reasonable, and I also think it's practicable, because there will be no second trial, and no further charges will be brought against him later on this matter. The complex changes, the friend is murdered, the videotape is gone, and the prosecutor cannot be proven guilty. So he had to rely on the last resort, the prosecutor's assistant girlfriend to overturn the case for him. Facts proved successful, and luck was on his side. However, this plan has several shortcomings. First, the purchases during the filming process are paid for with their own accounts. The traces left are too obvious and can easily be discovered by prosecutors; second, why don’t you back up the video tapes? At least one at home, one in the bank safe, and one with you so that you can show evidence at any time when you testify in court? Third, the safety of a friend cannot be guaranteed, which should be considered when it is realized. Fourth, there is no guarantee that his girlfriend will believe him in the end and can help him overturn the case, thus putting himself in danger and getting nothing. .
From this point of view, this plan is too risky and not well thought out. How to avoid these problems? Come up with another plan, very foresight. The overall idea remains the same, which is the same as above, but with a few points added. First, attract the attention of the prosecutor's assistant beauty from the beginning and try to catch her, which is not difficult for the male protagonist. What are you chasing after her? For the final reversal of the case, this was already planned; secondly, since it was planned for a long time to reverse the case, he would not be allowed to be directly proved by videotape in court that he did not commit a crime, so he decided to go with his friends. The illusion of filming, the illusion of cigarette butts pointing out the prosecutor's crime evidence to the boss, this is to give his girlfriend a hint of trust and key clues to reverse the case later, but here, his friend must be sacrificed. Because if his friend brought the videotape directly to the court, he could directly invalidate the judgment. But he knew it was impossible, because he couldn't fool the prosecutor with these simple tricks, and the prosecutor would surely discover his conspiracy. So only sacrifice his friends and useless tapes. This tricked the prosecutor into thinking that the protagonist was completely passive. In fact, the key point for the protagonist to reverse the case is not the videotape, but the investigation of his girlfriend later. So, from the very beginning, friends and videotapes were scams to confuse prosecutors. All omissions, including obvious shopping traces, insufficient backup of videotapes, and failure to bring them to court were intentional clues and opportunities for prosecutors. He even counted the prosecutors. Someone must be sent to murder a friend, so that the videotape will never come to court smoothly, using a friend to confuse the prosecutor, using the prosecutor to murder a friend, and then the reversal of the girlfriend's case is the key to the plan.
So, the case becomes: planning to kill, chasing after girlfriend (she can get inside information), using boss to pass cigarette butts information, using friends to make useless videotape, committing murder, befriending the police (to protect his girlfriend), by sacrificing Friends and videotape pretended to be completely passive, distracted the prosecutor, relaxed, went to jail, instructed his girlfriend how to overturn the case, and finally succeeded in overturning the case, gaining freedom, safety, fame, beauty, killing four birds with one stone, it was perfect plan. Using the law to escape and outside the law, the protagonist is powerful.
But even with this understanding, there are still some confusions and deficiencies: First, why do you want to show the original video to your girlfriend? It is unreasonable to let him take it back to study it carefully, according to the above analysis. It has to be explained, that is, to show off his achievements in order to win the heart of his girlfriend, but due to the lack of secrets, the files from many years ago really did not pay attention to the five-pointed star in the hand of the deceased, so he gave it to his girlfriend with confidence; second , the sudden appearance of the black policeman is indeed a bit abrupt, but it is also excusable; third, even if various arrangements and reminders have been made, how can we ensure that his girlfriend will be able to reverse the case for him? The writers didn't give enough detail on this point. But on the whole, although these deficiencies are not perfect, they can all be far-fetched and feasible. In any case, this kind of careful planning is worthy of recognition. In fact, the screenwriter's focus is on winning the benefits. In reflection on the social phenomenon of falsification, it is understandable that there are some flaws. In short, the screenwriter is very good, or it is not necessarily as good as me!
View more about Beyond a Reasonable Doubt reviews
