William should have started designing the next set in the latter part of the plot...

Oliver 2022-04-21 09:02:36

When I saw that it was almost over, I silently commented in my heart, giving it three or four stars. Not only is this professor too meticulous in his actions, leaving flaws everywhere for his opponents to pinch, but his wife and girlfriend are also all the way, acting recklessly, which is really annoying to watch. Guess the result is amazing, reverse the whole article. Give five stars, great!

Without this extraordinary ending of evil triumphing over justice, I'd say it's as lax as the holes in a fishing net. Judging from this ending, it is really impeccable. Like Ma Jingtao, a roaring, emotional, reckless professor who wants to investigate his neighbors but strutting, knows he is in danger, but does not seek foreign aid, and immediately becomes dizzy when he encounters an accident. His wife and son are scattered, and it should be used to frame the stolen goods.

Many people think that the neighbor William has been setting a trap from the very beginning of the child's injury, and they consider using the professor. I deeply disagree.
I think it was William who was forced to jump off the wall, and when his advice to the professor was ineffective, and the situation was about to be exposed, he went to the Scout camp to kidnap his child. At this moment, William began to think that he could actually design the professor as a scapegoat. Sure enough, this trick turned corruption into magic.
But there was no such plan at first, and it is impossible to estimate the world's affairs in such a long term, including the professor's engineering knowledge, whether he has curiosity and ability to act, and his impulsive personality. Second, they are indeed planning a second bombing, and it happens that this second gang is wandering around all day, so they will use him as a plan.

Therefore, there was no plan to live here as a neighbor, his son's hand was blown, the professor investigated William's identity, and the professor was exposed. Things were deduced to the later results, and only then did they take advantage of the opportunity and were used by William.
If you adhere to the "design from the beginning", the process will become full of contingency and unpredictability, and the plot will become as absurd and lack of reality as the opera.
Therefore, if there is an explanation in the middle and latter sections of the play: after showing William's thinking or planning, he will talk about one thing and one thing or another, instead of killing him, it is better to make good use of him, then the logic will be more rounded, and the reality will be stronger . Audiences won't be fooled into believing that William has designed him from the start.

View more about Arlington Road reviews

Extended Reading

Arlington Road quotes

  • Michael Faraday: You can't ask government to be infallible, but you can ask it to be accountable.

    Oliver Lang: I can ask it to be honest.

    Michael Faraday: You know, when Leah died, all I wanted was someone to tell me, "We made a mistake." You know? "We made a mistake. Your wife suffered for it, and we'd take it back a hundred times if we could." But they don't say that. She would've.

  • Michael Faraday: You're killing children!

    Oliver Lang: Their lies, their children.

    Michael Faraday: Children die!

    Oliver Lang: This is war. In a war, children die.