i love movies

Oliver 2022-03-23 09:03:03

One version of the German house drama genre best known for "The Meanest Man" is that it was a complete departure from German Expressionism at its peak, and another that it was only implicitly expressed. I prefer the second. Expressionism is the concretization of inner consciousness, and the various groups of people in "The Lowest Man" can be seen as symbols of our ugly psychology of clinging to the powerful.
"The Meanest Man" tells the very simple story of a cocky grand hotel janitor who turned into a miserable bathroom attendant overnight. In this way, the director can narrate slowly in 90 minutes, allowing the audience to fully feel the psychological state of the characters in the film. The film satirizes the powerful and powerful. The protagonist himself is also a clown under the powerful. A kind guest smiled and gave him a tip, but he even regarded it as a shame and put it aside. As for the episode at the end where the protagonist obtains tens of millions of inheritance, the director mischievously said in the film that it was "a happy ending that cannot happen in reality". In fact, it was a further irony. The protagonist who turned into a rich man went to the bathroom to wash his hands, and his hands were still covered with soap. He just touched the head of the waiter, handed him money and smoked cigars, he completely forgot his pain at that time.
The film was filmed in 1924, only 30 years after the invention of the earliest form of video camera, and only 10 years from Griffith's first feature film "The Birth of a Nation", which defined the smallest unit of film as the lens. In this film, the full use of the camera (follow-up, etc.) has also been widely praised by later generations. It is the enthusiasm of the filmmakers in the past that makes the film industry flourish today. I often see friends around me struggling to find positive energy. In fact, the best positive energy is what I usually take as a pastime when you are bored.

View more about The Last Laugh reviews

Extended Reading
  • Anabel 2022-03-25 09:01:19

    It is a prominent tragedy in Germany, and its full meaning can only be understood in a country where uniforms are king. It is undoubtedly a film with a strong sympathy for the living conditions of the lower-class employees of society, but also a the class symbols symbolized by their clothing), but all the criticism, at the unrealistic Chaplin-style banquet at the end, turns to criticism of the unimaginative lives of the poor, to whom money is merely In order to be the bargaining chip of its own opposite, it is difficult to provide space for 'alternative imagination' (such as class struggle and utopian socialism). In this sense, Murnau was a filmmaker with full artistic and realistic consciousness, and his sympathy did not lead to the praise of the poor.

  • Jaclyn 2022-01-18 08:01:15

    Watching this film at home and at school is the same, I just want to sleep when I watch it.