Master's Lens

Serenity 2022-03-26 09:01:04

[A] Apart from some strange value debates now, Hitchcock is still able to explain the meaning of "movie" at this extreme under the framework of such a "stage play". The carefully arranged figures are so wonderful after the rhythm of the painting and the aftertaste, creating a more detailed beauty in the omission and blank space. And the classic shot of swinging the door and hiding the rope is even more so. The fragmentation of the internal space, the link of external information, and the meaning of the film are completely constructed at this moment. As for the overall time bug problem (the one-hour banquet ended in less than half an hour), in my opinion, it is another manifestation of Xifa's strength, and it can be compressed with motion under long shots that are almost "space-time synchronization". Time, and as unnoticed as possible by the audience, it is terrifying to think about. In fact, except for those hidden editing points, there are also four very obvious front and back shots in the film. On the surface, it is the destruction of its immersive perception. In fact, it is the simplest and most effective cohesion method at the level of image and text, while the break of the long shot is a Really achieved these three positive and negative fights. The achievements of "Reaper of Souls" are no longer simply summed up as "experimental films".

Cathy 2022-03-27 09:01:04

I heard that Hitchcock later destroyed the film of this film, I want to know why. Is it because he didn't have a chance to appear in the film? O(∩_∩)O