Human memory is not completely credible. Every time period may be because the memory of aging is not reliable, or it may be because the memory will inevitably become better or crueler. It was during this repeated entry and exit that the memory became thinner and thinner, and the iron pestle was ground into needles. The judgment based on memory is even more unreliable. The film is about a scientist who developed a device to inject a person's physical energy into the memory of that person, but this memory is not necessarily true. If 100% of the real memory can be retrieved, then no one would think about committing a crime. Under what circumstances will legislation specify that under what circumstances can anyone's memory be forcibly retrieved? Pure power without supervision inevitably leads to dictatorship. If you think about it this way, this film is not a drama, a science fiction film, but a thriller.
I went to the toilet and forgot what to write, it's definitely not a movie review anyway.
Guilt makes a person more powerful, and it changes him as well. If Anthony's father hadn't lied to him, he would have dared to commit suicide. Memories can be fabricated, and lies can be well-meaning.
Looking back, we were almost together forever, didn't we?
View more about Extracted reviews
