white and trace, Reivew on The Gospel According to St. Matthew

As far as images are concerned, I have always considered Matthew to be one of the coolest and purest religious films in film history, with the exception of Dreyer's Joan of Arc, which is rarely on the right. In comparison, even the crucifixion of Jesus in Tarkovsky's "Andrei Ruflev" shows too much warmth. The root cause may be as Roger Ebert said: "Because he does not believe in God, he does not preach, praise, deliberately emphasize, or sentimental and romanticize the story, but just try to record it.
Aristotle said in Nicomachean ethics that all art, All desires, and all actions and explorations, can be seen as aiming at some kind of good. Therefore, the good can be properly defined in terms of the aim of the pursuit of things.

- Therefore, I feel that Pasolini has nothing to do with Christ . There's not much real awe, I believe he's just awe-inspiring the concept of naked beauty. The Jesus in his mind and Derek Jarman's Spastian are not different, both are a sublime thing, a most sacred thing The shell of his to attach importance to his own utopia, and then use this to complete his modernist, ultra-realistic aesthetic pursuit.
Besides, the so-called god is nothing

View more about The Gospel According to St. Matthew reviews

The Gospel According to St. Matthew pictures