It may be a bit contrived to say that, but I have to be honest: Human beings are so lowly and weak that nothing that seems to be high and indestructible can withstand being beaten.
Leaving the altar, leaving the worship, stripping the identity, we took a closer look: Hey, he is just a bad old man, and he is still angry, it is just a joke.
The goddess is the same.
Well, the above words are a bit rooted in recent resentment. But at a certain point I saw from the film, it was similar.
Ruby is Kevin's creation. It can be said that Ruby is a piece of Kevin's self-aware code. Kevin can rewrite her using very general sentences. Although this rewriting is very superficial, Ruby still has the mechanism of human thinking. , can be rationalized to a certain extent, but when she finds that she repeatedly violates the logical setting originally written, when the accumulation of paradoxes cannot be resolved by the subconscious, everything becomes unexplainable, and the psychological homeostasis is broken.
In the final analysis, although ruby is Kevin's creation, she is God's creation, and Kevin is also God's creation, so in terms of logic mechanism, they have the same thing. It is worth mentioning that, earlier, Kevin's rewriting was a directional rough modification, so that this modification can be processed and modified by ruby's logic mechanism, so that although ruby's change is immediate, this kind of modification The change is so in line with the logic of the Son of God, that is to say, regardless of the continuity of time, considering a single behavior pattern, it is so natural for Kevin; and the code that Kevin typed in the sentence is so natural. It can also be seen that it is a simple, direct and rude execution-type statement. At this time, this kind of accepting command behavior has become mechanized and materialized, and has lost the divinity of God's logic. Therefore, at that time, Kevin looked at this as if The container of the soul was suddenly emptied, and the three views suddenly collapsed.
Let's talk about distance again. This story is destined to be a tragedy from the beginning, because there is an asymmetric relationship in the setting, the master-slave relationship, the relationship between developers and software, is a rolling asymmetry. This is an irreparable tragedy for love. What we want is a lover of equal status, who will be happy, angry, clinging, ignoring, leaving, and returning. Control, this uncertain, groundbreaking relationship is the love we look for, not a pinched, obedient maid. As long as Kevin (the director?) holds the script, the distance between him and Ruby is amazingly far, and they are simply two-dimensional people. Kevin can only look down on Ruby from the perspective of God. In the film, there is a scene where ruby surrounds Kevin, and Kevin pats ruby's beautiful back. It is clearly not a couple but a father and a daughter.
Although Kevin has repeatedly hoped not to use the "Greedisgood" command, this is followed by a game modifier but not expected to be used, or restrictive use, such as "I only increase my own 10,000 gold coins but will never modify the gas acquisition", such as As you can see, this full sense of superiority has long been revealed.
In addition, I think this is a variant of the hypnotic theme. The story is about the logic crisis caused by the writing of code. Although it has been changed to YY from the best-selling Diaosi writer, the core has not changed.
View more about Ruby Sparks reviews
