Winning such a film must make many young directors full of confidence, with a small cost and a big harvest.
In fact, it is not enough to adjust the art of a good film, and it is not enough to have a small cost. Your light, your cg, and everything can be settled, but the core of the spirit cannot be settled. What you want to say, how you say it, you have to look up a lot of data, think about a lot of questions, and read a lot, philosophy is fundamental to you. This way it is at least a work. The rest is up to your luck. After all, as far as the result of doing art is concerned, there is still some luck.
Reminds me of a domestic director who, like everyone else, wanted to get an international award to increase his popularity, he directly copied a "Xiao Wu" - just in form, rough film, boring single shot, naturally fruitless, He said no luck this time, hard to say. What I want to say is: the judges are still there, at least aesthetically. How many people mistakenly believe that those who liked the film are pretending to be fake art films on your assembly line, and how many people's aesthetics cannot be improved. Isn't part of the reason for the xx of domestic films caused by the stagnation of public aesthetics? ben enculer!
Kim Ki-duk's film perspective is still so cruel and calm and suffocating.
View more about Pieta reviews
