For everyone who is familiar with words and regards words as a tool of life, this is extremely easy to happen. It may be very contrived to say that, and there is suspicion of self-delusion, but it is true.
No one believes that imaginative writing creates authenticity, and no normal person takes an obvious storyline as reality. This is very normal because people are people, and people consciously distinguish themselves from the world.
What exists actively in people's minds is false, and what exists passively in this world is true. In my pseudo-philosophy, this is the basic principle by which people distinguish between true and false.
Sometimes imagination is sought after and praised for its magnificent and fantastic, and sometimes it is despised because it is too unrestrained and even violates the current morality. Perhaps the greatest difference between a good writer and a lineman is whether the imagination is acceptable in a more normal way.
The difference between a talented writer and a sleazy guy is whether there is respect. So no matter how outrageous some yy novels are, they are still worthy of recognition, and there are some works that lack at least respect for women or men.
I have seen more than one writer express such thoughts, novels are like their own children, all you can decide is his genes, once he grows up, he is destined to be out of your jurisdiction, and you can only follow his life , watching him go, can no longer intervene, even if he will be far away from the track you originally set.
I have a deep understanding that this is a rule of creation. You can violate the rules, but the final price is a failed work. You must respect the characters you write and respect them, because from the time you wrote the first word about him, they have escaped from your mind to reality, exist in this world, and become real. Respect for characters is the morality of writers.
All of Kevin's initial imaginations about Ruby are realistic. Life experiences, clothing, language, and expressions, these realistic features outline a person's personality. In the later period, Kevin's tampering with Ruby was almost entirely tampering with his emotions and personality. Therefore, contradictions are inevitable, and Ruby will definitely become strange, because she has her own path, but she was forced to go in another direction that she likes by the author Kevin. The kind of pain Kevin feels is the pain of writing to the end, finding a huge contradiction, finding a failed characterization.
Is it possible to extend this rule to love? The initial impression of the lover is almost entirely centered on the characteristics that attract him, and then we automatically and automatically draw his personality from these characteristics, of course not perfect, and even broken by these discoveries, even Stimulate our desire to transform, these processes are called run-in.
Perhaps the luckiest is that the lover is never under our control, not tampered with by us. This is the biggest difference between true and false. Creation has rules, but love does not.
Kevin's last line probably meant that ruby just passed by my side, and I had the honor to record her.
This seems to be a very, very famous quote.
Those virtual people pass by me, I record them, they exist because of it, and I am filled with a sense of accomplishment because of this. Although they can go and stay, I am still happy to have known them.
View more about Ruby Sparks reviews
