Sophie's performance left me with an Anna who wanted, dared, wanted and struggled extremely, perhaps more of an explosion after temptation. As I have always agreed with a sentence: no matter how much you like each other, the initiative in love must be a man. But last night's Anna was a queen, Woronsky became a dog's leg, and the queen said: I want you to stay! Dogleg said: Good! The Queen said: I want to be with my husband! Dogleg said: Okay, I'm going away! The queen said: you come back, I still want you! Dogleg said: Good, I'll come here! The heroine's struggle is so light and her aura is so strong, but the man's natural "seduction" skills, which are sunk and fluctuated in his emotions, cannot be seen to be exerted.
I always stubbornly believe that if the love of cheating is touched by the flesh, it is not clear whether it is love or not, and I prefer to label it cleanly so that it has never been love from beginning to end. So those few violent melee scenes, in my opinion, really ruined the beauty of eroticism and eroticism.
As for Karenin in my opinion, he should be a near-perfect husband candidate based on secular and even social standards. The struggle was even more tragic and strenuous than Anna's. Anna brought him an unspeakable shame, but what he cared about was not a green hat, but the broken order. The purpose of his struggle is to pull out all the weeds that disrupt his order, not to condone a willful, emotionally impulsive daughter, so his struggle should be the extreme restraint of anger, hatred and violence under forced calm. , not really calm patience, thinking, planning.
Speaking of which, I knew from the very beginning that Sister Kayla's physique couldn't play the Anna in my impression, and she couldn't come out with the charm and temptation. I also read a lot of previous comments, and I don't like it and I don't understand it, but in any case, the version of Anna that Keira Knightley and Joe White created together again is something I will definitely watch.
Because of "Anna Karenina," because of Keira Knightley, and because of "Pride and Prejudice."
Finally, thinking about it, Sister Keira probably wanted to play Anna too much, so the traces of the performance were too obvious, but she lost the ease and naturalness of playing Elizabeth. Really good acting skills are never seen at a glance, but at the moment of transition of interpretation, suddenly catch the taste, and then feel relieved and revisit it a few times, it is even more meaningful. In contrast, because of the heroine's brisk interpretation, the special positioning of the characters, the fit between the actors and the form of expression, and the director's grasp of the British tune, the 05 version of "Pride and Prejudice" has its own style, and it's okay to enjoy it. .
In fact, Keira's special temperament, plus silk and satin gorgeous clothes, plus natural and beautiful scene switching, plus a few handsome guys with each heroic spirit, you can watch the popcorn stage play on the spot, but you can eat it for two hours and ten minutes. The popcorn is too upset. Fortunately, the portrayal of Levin, an autobiographical character, was not frivolous or wasted, so it would not have brought Toon his old man's anger to life.
However, a movie is a movie after all, and those who don't want the movie to be exactly the same as the literature, why don't they just go home and hold a big book.
View more about Anna Karenina reviews
