God still shot

Leopold 2022-03-24 09:01:42

I have never disliked or admired the films of the Coen brothers. I have not seen many films. Most of "Frozen" and "No Country for Old Men" have a dark tone of murderer, gloomy, and unsolvable cases, which makes me always follow the United States. The countryside is separated by a layer of alienation. This "Serious Man" is different. The dark humor has always mixed with the incomprehensible Schrödinger's cat theory, which has swayed people's appetite for the ending of the story.

I never know anything about physics, but I do know a little about cats. On the way back from the American event center, I kept Baidu's "Schrödinger's cat" theory

. Yes, the probability of each possibility is 100%, but once there is a subjective observation, there will be a "probability collapse", and all possibilities can be attributed to a "fact".

Then there's a phone split-screen showing a six-page encyclopedia:

put a cat in an opaque box, and connect that box to an experimental setup that contains a radioactive nucleus and a container of toxic gas. Imagine that this radioactive nucleus has a 50% chance of decaying within an hour. If it decays, it will emit a particle, and the emitted particle will trigger the experimental device, open the container of poison gas, and kill the cat. According to quantum mechanics, when no observations are made, the nucleus is in a superposition of decayed and non-decayed, but if the box is opened after an hour, the experimenter can only see "decayed nuclei and dead cats" or "undecayed" nuclei and live cats".

Along the way, I began to struggle with this half-dead Schrödinger cat, this serious man who was in constant trouble, and the 20 yuan in the little boy's Walkman.

Perhaps, the serious man who talks about physics in college is himself a half-dead Schrödinger cat. When his life is put into "an opaque box", family problems, neighborhood problems, work problems, and emotional problems occur one after another." Decay", he still fantasizes that he is the same as before, but can only live the life he wants in a dream. In my impression, every time he encounters a difficult life problem, he will choose a smooth way to solve it, but the result is just a sad dream.

He is like "the cat in the box", he doesn't want to live this kind of unclear life, he starts to seek one rabbi after another, he wants to know whether he is 100% alive or 100% dead:

The first rabbi summed up his point of view of looking at things and believed that he should observe from a different point of view, just as the life and death of "Schrödinger's cat" depends on people's subjective observation. The second rabbi made a big circle of "help me", but finally concluded his statement with "who care", no one wants to care about the invisible cat. The third rabbi was more pure, sitting in a room with the door closed, and his announcement to the man outside was "he's busy".

He had no choice but to struggle in this "invisible box" until at the end of the film he received a phone call and he needed to go to the hospital to see his X-ray immediately, the real "serious" thing was finally going to happen in " a man". Or maybe God was crazy about Schrödinger's cat and shot the poor cat like Hawking.

At the end, the little boy finally has the money to pay back the "creditor" who has been chasing him, but it seems that the "creditor" has long forgotten about it. This seems to be another "Schrödinger's cat" mapping, if you don't care about the cat's life or death, then the cat doesn't exist. Everything depends on your point of view.

The composition of the film is very special. The protagonist always appears on the left side of the screen, and the beautiful scenery of the blockbuster occupies most of the right side. Many of the pictures are ingeniously conceived and the shots are used very skillfully, which should be the narrative language that the Coen brothers are good at.

I don't understand the first paragraph at all, and there are many places in the middle that I can see "in the middle", but the film is very interesting overall. The dark humor and "Schrödinger's cat" mix together to create a unique flavor, which makes the whole film wonderful and beautiful.

ps: This film is one of the screenings of the "Jewish Film Festival". I watched it at the American event center. I was impressed by the friendliness of the organizer and the staff. Thank you for the screening.

View more about A Serious Man reviews

Extended Reading
  • Aidan 2022-03-27 09:01:05

    I don't like the style very much, the confused thinking, the unintelligible plot, it may be a good movie, but I can't accept it

  • Thaddeus 2022-03-27 09:01:05

    All I can say is, I'm too superficial to understand at all.

A Serious Man quotes

  • Larry Gopnik: She seems to be asking an awful lot. But then, I don't know. Somebody has to pay for Sy's funeral.

    Rabbi Nachtner: Uh-huh.

    Larry Gopnik: His own estate is in probate, but why does it have to be me? Or is it wrong to complain? Judy says it is. But I'm so strapped for cash right now, carrying the mortgage, and paying for the Jolly Roger, and I wrecked the car, and Danny's Bar Mitzvah coming up, I...

    Rabbi Nachtner: Something like this... there's never a good time.

    Larry Gopnik: I don't know where it all leaves me, Sy's death. Obviously it's not gonna go back like it was.

    Rabbi Nachtner: Mm. Would you even want that, Larry?

    Larry Gopnik: No, I- well, yeah... sometimes... or... I don't know; I guess the honest answer is "I don't know". What was my life before? Not what I thought it was. What does it all mean? What is Hashem trying to tell me, making me pay for Sy Ableman's funeral?

    Rabbi Nachtner: Mm.

    Larry Gopnik: And did I tell you I had a car accident the same time Sy had his? The same instant, for all I know. I mean, is Hashem telling me that Sy Ableman is me? Or that we are all one, or something?

    Rabbi Nachtner: How does God speak to us? A good question.

  • Rabbi Nachtner: You know Lee Sussman.

    Larry Gopnik: Doctor Sussman? I think I - yeah.

    Rabbi Nachtner: Did he ever tell you about the goy's teeth?

    Larry Gopnik: No... I- What goy?

    Rabbi Nachtner: So... Lee is at work one day; you know he has the orthodontic practice there at Great Bear. He's making a plaster mold - it's for corrective bridge work - in the mouth of one of his patients, Russell Kraus. The mold dries and Lee is examining it one day before fabricating an appliance. He notices something unusual. There appears to be something engraved on the inside of the patient's lower incisors. He vav shin yud ayin nun yud. "Hwshy 'ny". "Help me, save me". This in a goy's mouth, Larry. He calls the goy back on the pretense of needing additional measurements for the appliance. "How are you? Noticed any other problems with your teeth?" No. There it is. "Hwshy 'ny". "Help me". Son of a gun. Sussman goes home. Can Sussman eat? Sussman can't eat. Can Sussman sleep? Sussman can't sleep. Sussman looks at the molds of his other patients, goy and Jew alike, seeking other messages. He finds none. He looks in his own mouth. Nothing. He looks in his wife's mouth. Nothing. But Sussman is an educated man. Not the world's greatest sage, maybe, no Rabbi Marshak, but he knows a thing or two from the Zohar and the Caballah. He knows that every Hebrew letter has its numeric equivalent. 8-4-5-4-4-7-3. Seven digits... a phone number, maybe? "Hello? Do you know a goy named Kraus, Russell Kraus?" Who? "Where have I called? The Red Owl in Bloomington. Thanks so much." He goes. It's a Red Owl. Groceries; what have you. Sussman goes home. What does it mean? He has to find out if he is ever to sleep again. He goes to see... the Rabbi Nachtner. He comes in, he sits right where you're sitting right now. "What does it mean, Rabbi? Is it a sign from Hashem, 'Help me'? I, Sussman, should be doing something to help this goy? Doing what? The teeth don't say. Or maybe I'm supposed to help people generally, lead a more righteous life? Is the answer in Caballah? In Torah? Or is there even a question? Tell me, Rabbi, what can such a sign mean?"

    [pause as the Rabbi drinks his tea]

    Larry Gopnik: So what did you tell him?

    Rabbi Nachtner: Sussman?

    Larry Gopnik: Yes!

    Rabbi Nachtner: Is it... relevant?

    Larry Gopnik: Well, isn't that why you're telling me?

    Rabbi Nachtner: Okay. Nachtner says, look. The teeth, we don't know. A sign from Hashem? Don't know. Helping others... couldn't hurt.

    Larry Gopnik: No! No, but... who put it there? Was it for him, Sussman, or for whoever found it, or for just, for, for...

    Rabbi Nachtner: We can't know everything.

    Larry Gopnik: It sounds like you don't know anything! Why even tell me the story?

    Rabbi Nachtner: [chuckling] First I should tell you, then I shouldn't.

    Larry Gopnik: What happened to Sussman?

    Rabbi Nachtner: What would happen? Not much. He went back to work. For a while he checked every patient's teeth for new messages. He didn't find any. In time, he found he'd stopped checking. He returned to life. These questions that are bothering you, Larry - maybe they're like a toothache. We feel them for a while, then they go away.

    Larry Gopnik: I don't want it to just go away! I want an answer!

    Rabbi Nachtner: Sure! We all want the answer! But Hashem doesn't owe us the answer, Larry. Hashem doesn't owe us anything. The obligation runs the other way.

    Larry Gopnik: Why does he make us feel the questions if he's not gonna give us any answers?

    Rabbi Nachtner: He hasn't told me.

    [Larry puts his face in his hands in despair]

    Larry Gopnik: And... what happened to the goy?

    Rabbi Nachtner: The goy? Who cares?