This novel has been filmed many times in the film version, and I am fortunate to have not seen the other version once. It is also a new acceptance.
The beginning of the film is a staged performance, and I am used to shooting the scene in a straight-forward manner. This kind of stage performance is relatively easy to accept. Everything is in the studio, a kind of interpretation of the novel.
It was originally an evening task, but it was delayed until midnight to complete it. Sitting here and thinking about it, can Anna not commit suicide in the end? Later, I found out that it is not possible. Do you say religion is abominable, human nature is great, or human words are terrible? It seems to be more important, and then Anna doesn't know what to do. Now, Anna may be fine, she can get married again, she can fight for Alyosha, and she can fight for Anne's custody. Unfortunately, this is all Tsarist Russia in the late 19th century. None of this can be achieved. Anna has completed her rebellion and fulfilled herself.
I don't know much about novels, so I looked for Leo Tolstoy's information and found that Anna was so great and a relatively full-fledged character in the history of literature. I marvel at the depth of Tolstoy's thought, and I have time to read this novel, as well as war and peace. Fiction sometimes has such charm, it just reflects the trend of some social ideological changes, they are all more profound.
The movie completely reflects the story narrated in the novel, and the climax of the movie is achieved by Anna lying on the track. The beginning of the train, the end of the train. The beginning of the train was because the kind Anna saw the tragic death of a poor train worker under the wheel, and Vronsky's hypocritical charity act was moved. Her brother couldn't stand the anguish of the family and kept having extramarital affairs. Anna became a peace ambassador and betrayed herself. Anna's brother also harmed others. I think love or marriage is also very evil. This uniqueness is really very demanding. People can't restrain their own desires. Anna and Anna's brother, Anna is more advocating of human nature. As a result, Anna knew it by herself. If you have lost yourself, you can't let yourself go. People who are too pure are terrible.
Levin in the movie is a very funny young man. He said, I am not pursuing simple happiness, a child with ideas, um, and then I found a reliable girl, and I am happy with each other, and my life can be ok. Happiness is achieved by reason, and marriage and family are built because of reason. I didn't understand it very clearly in the movie, and then I don't understand it very well sitting here, I think I'm quite stupid. Levin is also a projection of Tolstoy. He sympathized with the serfs, but he couldn't help them. Tolstoy was very happy, so he used Levin to express his wish. I sincerely say, Kitty, Levin's wife is really a good girl, and she can find her way back when she gets lost, but I don't particularly understand Tolstoy's attitude towards her, maybe I can understand it by reading the novel.
There is always a difference between a wise person and a stupid person, such as Anna and her sister-in-law, Dolly. Although I say Li, Dolly is also a person worthy of sympathy. Later in the movie, Dolly in turn comforts Anna, but At this time, Anna had been replaced by Daoli of the year. Anna was much braver than Daoli. She was rebellious and resisted. Anna knows that she is not wrong, but Anna has no way to solve the predicament. Is this a problem of human liberation? It is really poignant that Anna made everything with one hand, and then was destroyed. The world in the future will eventually be different.
I don't know if Tolstoy was just writing about himself, but seeing Tolstoy's profile looks like it. Anna, and Levin are both authors themselves.
Talking about the fun places in the movie, I think they have a very fun dance party, the men and women are dancing, the men and women are all flamboyant, graceful and graceful dancing, I envy the clothes of the ladies in the movie, once It makes me think that time should be reversed, it should be elegant, those are the landlord class, how much accumulation does it take to be a landlord class.
Some people say that Tsarist Russia and China are actually very similar, and I also look for them in the movie. Where exactly is the similarity, or whether the ethnic groups in the world are not very similar to each other, who knows. It is a western country after all. Politically speaking, Tsarist Russia and China both like that kind of dictatorial hero. Well, Russia is a country where serfs farm land, and China is also a country with a peasant economy. This is very similar. Hehe, what about like, like the society is like this. I think too much. sleep earlier. It's just a movie, is it worth it if you don't sleep?
When Anna is serious, it will be difficult to turn back. This is Anna's lovely place.
Postscript, later I read the book Levin was the protagonist, he saw these things, and then, he felt the happiness. Well, is it not time for people to know how to live their own lives according to the secular standards, the consequence of challenging the secular is that you have the ability to defeat the secular. Well Well.
View more about Anna Karenina reviews
