View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
12 angry men
Ora 2022-09-14 02:04:30
Because I haven't seen the black and white version of the TV series in 1957, the reduction of the film as a TV series feels good, and I feel a lot. The scene of the movie is a jury meeting room, 12 jurors, a simple scene arrangement, but the interpretation is a story about legal justice and the jury system. 1) The majority vote of the jurors can decide the life and death of the criminal, the will of the majority, is this the justice of the law, and their decision is the truth? 2) Can jurors perform their duties well, not out of their own selfishness, likes and dislikes, is the jury system reasonable? Are the decisions of the majority in line with the truth? 3) Is the testimony of the witness credible? Can witnesses be impartial and impartial? Can the testimony of the criminal's life and death certificate be decided? 4) Everyone has the right to live. We must treat each life fairly. No one is born a criminal, and his character cannot be determined according to his growth background. 5)
Extended Reading
-
Juror #5: I used to play in a backyard that was filled with garbage. Maybe it still smells on me.
-
Juror #8: Ever since we've walked into this room, you've acted like a self-appointed public avenger!
Juror #3: Shut up...
Juror #8: You want the boy to die for your own personal reasons, not because of the facts!
[Juror #3 tries to get his hands on Juror #8, but some other jurors hold him back]
Juror #8: You're a sadist!
Juror #3: I'll kill ya!
Juror #8: You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?