What people call the truth may just be the side that is deliberately presented to you. The film seems a bit messy, but when you see the end, you can't help but feel a little bit stuck. Students who are willing to do anything for you, see it for the first time, and feel that Berlin is apologetic for deliberately wronging the professor. When they see this signature at the end, they suddenly realize that anything, of course, includes promoting his ideas. And Dusty, at first, I couldn't figure out why he didn't stop Bessie. If he wanted to wake up with blood, why would he bring the video to Bessie. As for the bad stalking, it was even more ridiculous. At the end of the line, I realized that Dusty did it on purpose. He deliberately exposed it to Bessie and asked her to check. By the way, Bessie's car broke down and Dusty must have something to do with it. In the film, it seems that the incompetent lawyer, the dog-blooded stalker, the gentle-looking professor, the wise and deadly terrifying woman with blood cancer, everything we see is what the organization allows us to see. How sad that it is necessary to present the facts to Bessie, perhaps out of respect for her journalist status and her persistence and bravery for the truth. Or maybe it's for Bessie's key to freedom
View more about
The Life of David Gale reviews