The first film gave me the feeling of being sarcastic and mocking, pointing out social problems and the system behind the scenes. And this department is a bit serious, not only the death of the damn, the injury of the injury, the mediation between the system and the system also gradually escalated layer by layer, and finally a war broke out.
Sure enough, after watching the film, I had to write it immediately. After a while, my mind became a little confused. I made a rationale. The film tries to point out that the chaos of the police system cannot actually be solved, because it is not an independent issue but is also related to political elections. , and then see that the common goal of the coordination of each system is to maximize personal interests, and people will not be destroyed for their own sake. And the most injured, like the first part, are the innocent people who died, and at the same time they were always the lower class.
I just watched Eyes Wide Shut, but the core content is the same. Big fish eat small fish, small fish eat dried shrimp, and dried shrimp eat mayfly. The survival and death of several bacteria is not within the scope of statistics at all. Either EYES WIDE SHUT live, or you simply can't understand what you're seeing.
And the theme of the elite army is that the system seems to have its own will and vitality - when you see the will, you think of Schopenhauer's level - it is constantly evolving, no matter how you try to break it and let this rotten system Be normal, work for me, and in the end it will all evolve in a way that rapes your imagination and becomes stronger to try to devour you.
The popularity of this film is naturally a hit on the G-spot of the Brazilian people, but as a celestial onlooker, I feel that it is good that you raised a problem, but you have no solution! Individual heroism cannot save the country, at most it turns into beating, smashing, looting and burning. The second part is just on the basis of the first part, and more content is involved, just like the first part shoots knife battles, the second part shoots gun battles, and the third part shoots nuclear wars, I'll let it go, Essentially no progress. Towards the end of the film, if you talk about a larger scope, even if you take out everything from all walks of life in Brazil, it will not solve the problem. The first part of the system has already been explained.
I'm messy again.
So why corrupt. That is, the distribution is uneven, and the distribution of various endowments is uneven, because the world is not one yuan, and it is not possible to solve problems with numbers. Our world is pluralistic. Statistics is trash because statistics is always about solving problems with numbers! A number is always a line, no matter how you break it, it is still a line. You can never use numbers to measure the pros and cons between intelligence and emotional intelligence and other random things. If you lose something, you will gain it. Blind people will have better touch and hearing, but difference is different. As long as you are different in one aspect, it will come out. various psychological problems. Anarchism is useless, the rights are shared equally, but the differences in endowments are still there. Later, they will form a group. Once they form a group, they will have a leader. If they have a leader, they will have privileges. In the end, layering becomes a system of layer-by-layer exploitation.
So why does the first film look good, because the tone is right, with some cynicism and a little gunfight hippie, the whole film will make people very emotional. And once you have to fight against the system, your intelligence can't keep up, and if you can't keep up, your individualism will look very pale. Once pale, I don't understand where your director is standing. After all, director, you are also in the system... Why does this film feel like the first person of the system...
Finally, I admit that it was written and thought in a mess, and I gave this film review 1 point...
View more about Elite Squad 2: The Enemy Within reviews
