Although the director did a lot of homework and even said that the lines in it can be found out, he also mentioned in the interview that the sex affair was:
"An invention with justification . I was taken to ask by a young woman who had seen the trailer. She was trying to convince me that Sabina and Jung never had sex. In her letters Sabina wrote about Jung in poetic terms, this woman claimed. You could have sexual poetry , I wanted to point out to her. But in her diary and letters to Freud, Sabina wrote, 'I gave Jung my maidenhood, my innocence.' In the Victorian era that could only mean one thing. They had a sexual affair. We coupled that with how she talked about her father and being beaten, how that turned her on sexually..."
It can only be said that the director understands it, but who can say that what people say is not a metaphor? Therefore, it's hard not to doubt that SM is an eye-catching approach. In fact, it's a boring film that people with knowledge background look nostalgic. Why not just make it more boring.
Two unrelated words, 1. There are all kinds of good-looking white shirts in the film, 2. I just watched Uncle Bi played the robot in red uniform, and Uncle is invincible, 3. Jung talked about two dreams in the film, my The analysis is almost the same as the analysis in the film, is it a coincidence or it is too simple or I can be a teacher...
View more about A Dangerous Method reviews
