simple terms, King Arthur's statement is that "the king undertakes obligations and bears his destiny" and the
conquering king's statement is "the king controls others to become the benchmark and ideal for others"
History, fate, expectation, hope, these Is something a person can carry, obviously not. As a king, you should lead the people to pursue these things, because with the people's sharing, the king can become a king, not a child overwhelmed by burdens, right?
We can share weal and woe, but we cannot share wealth and honor. This is the truth. When you don't get it, you can use the demand to bind people's hearts. When once you get it, when the demand can't bind people, you should use desire to bind people. The king is not the servant of the people. The destiny of the king is to let the people have desires and have the strength to obtain desires. What a single individual cannot accomplish is left to the collective to do, and the king is the leader who guides the individual to accomplish what cannot be accomplished, not a lone hero.
View more about Fate/Zero reviews
