It's a film with criminal content, and I don't think there's any objection to that. Looking at this film from the perspective of crime, it brings us a deep understanding and understanding of crime.
What is "crime", I don't explain it, but what is the most worried about the criminals? The original words in the film are "the greatest danger to criminals is not the investigation of the possibility of past facts, but the trouble that may arise in the future" , he said a bunch of words in secret, what he was saying, in fact, he was saying: In the past or now, if I can successfully realize it, I can freely and freely carry out my criminal behaviors and activities. There is no danger, what really endangers me is my future, and I have to bear, bear and bear the legal sanctions against me. Because of this, we usually see on the news that criminals who have been arrested and brought to justice cry bitterly. It is ridiculous that when he committed a crime, he didn't feel that he regretted it. It was because he considered that there would be consequences and responsibilities of one kind or another in the future. And the line" exists.
"How to solve the troubles that I will face in the future?", there is awareness and thinking about this problem, which is the difference and watershed between high-IQ crimes and low-IQ crimes. Being able to commit crimes freely and freely in the past and present, and will not bear or suffer any troubles punished by law in the future, this is the whole question to be considered in a perfect crime. If it can be successfully achieved and realized, this is the "Perfect crime" and "perfect crime" are not crimes that have not yet been closed, but crimes that have been closed as scapegoats. Of course, there are many ways to achieve "perfect crime". "My dad is Li Gang" is one of them. It is a kind of superman with special functions such as invisibility, and the most realistic and simple way is to be the "perfect criminal" that the writers of artistic creation have long wanted to create. What is a "perfect criminal"? If the criminal who is brought to justice in a certain case happens to be the criminal who committed the crime and behavior in this case, then the criminal who committed the crime is not a "perfect criminal". At this time in the film, a series of in the field of mathematics The research results of the above sequence of numbers, as well as a series of logical sequence symbols at the crime scene in the film, were presented and displayed in front of us. I suddenly realized that logical reasoning is a tool that can be used to engage in criminal activities and behaviors. Dayton used logical reasoning to cover up the crime of killing Mrs. Eagleton for Beth, and the truck driver who was saving his daughter also used logic to cover up the crime of killing a carload of students.
Enlightenment 1: Criminals with high IQ are criminals who play logical reasoning with you to evade legal punishment, and are free to engage in criminal activities at will. However, it must be remembered that criminals with high IQs will not appear in any social environment. In the illiberal and democratic power society environment of "if you want to add sins, there will be no criminals with high IQs." In a powerful social environment, people can hardly use the logical intelligence of their own brains. There is no room and opportunity for logic to be used here. Therefore, science can exist in the social environment of the United States, Britain, France, Spain, Italy, Germany...all Western countries. and development, but there is absolutely no scientific invention and creation in the celestial dynasty. The most that can be done is to follow other people's buttocks, understand other people's technology and technology, and then blindly copy and copy.
In order to explain how the old professor Selton used logical reasoning to successfully cover up the crime of murder for Beth, the film cites the advanced and cutting-edge theories of mankind in contemporary philosophy, mathematics, quantum physics, etc. , to explain the development of the case and the background of the case, so that the audience can understand the entire development process of the case shown in the film, but I prefer to regard this film as a science and education film, and the film presented The development experience of the entire murder case is a concrete and vivid explanation of the advanced and cutting-edge theories in the understanding and study of philosophy, mathematics, quantum physics, etc. In this sense and perspective, there is no murder case. This film just wears a vest with the label of a suspenseful and thriller film. It is not a crime action film, but a popular science education film. However, I always feel that the "butterfly effect" is a false proposition. There are no other factors. Just a butterfly flapping its wings, will there be a hurricane? At the end of the film, the old professor Selton took a bite and labelled Martin a "butterfly". Martin, who was stunned, didn't react. There was no specific object like Beth. I, Martin, don't say flapping his wings, Even if you keep flapping your wings thousands of times, there may not be a series of hurricanes of murder and criminal activities that follow. Why do you have to rely on me for everything, because I am the butterfly who started the servant. , "Ginger is still old and spicy", the old professor Selton himself stood on Beth's position, defended, cared for Beth, and spoke for Beth, "It's all my fault?" Martin, who is good at logical reasoning, actually Would you not even notice this?
Enlightenment 2: can we know the truth? At the end of the film, Martin uncovers the truth of a series of murder cases, and logical determinism is self-defeating in the face of facts, because no one except the murderer himself, Martin and old professor Selton Knowing who was the murderer of Mrs Eagleton's crime, even Martin had to admit at the end: a very sad thing, numbers can lie, not as I once thought; the real truth is not mathematics, but Absurdity, chaos, randomness, disorder and deep pain. Whether human beings have knowledge or ignorance of the world is a question worth pondering.
View more about The Oxford Murders reviews
