prefer what is human. What is a machine.
Humans belong to Homo sapiens] The living body is and is the human being. This definition does
not say fertilized eggs. Change the bottom layer of the whole body. It is not a problem to use artificial limbs, electronic brains, or even complete virtualization in the network... Can Said that there is not a person behind these device terminals. I think he is still..
So I picked it up: the ability to have free will, thinking ability, logic ability and incidental (can be included but not required) language, emotion, etc. is a person. .This completely abandons the bottom layer. Definitions that are limited only at the spiritual level...
then....this definition becomes anti-human..by
definition.Babies, even children.mentally retarded..vegetative...etc Are all excluded from the scope of human..
wait. This is anti-human? Do we have more established settings?. He|she|It is not the person we define..Then we think of inhuman Treat him|her|them?... This causal logic is anti-human... For example: a person is not a person when he dies.. There is no doubt about this. But we still do mourning rituals for corpses. Funerals. .No one said this is anti-human..Babies ,
even children.mentally retarded..vegetative...etc. Not being defined as a human does not mean that we can treat him|her|them inhumanly..well..see
Look at the program|Robot here...
According to the previous definition..The AI that passes the Turing test can basically be called a human...
Some people may be worried about this. They insist that it is only on the chip and circuit board. Current..he|she
|it might talk to you about how the movie is..how the meal is delicious..but it doesn't really understand the movie and
the meal..let me be lazy to quote a passage from Matrix67.:http://www.matrix67.com/blog/archives/4930
===================================== ===
I remember that I once read a science fiction novel, but I can't remember the title, nor the plot at all. I just remember the shock when I read the first page of the novel. At the beginning of the novel, the author asks, what is self-awareness? The author goes on to write that small animals such as paramecia and earthworms are usually not self-aware. Animals such as cats and dogs may have some self-awareness. As for people, in fact, I can only guarantee that I have self-awareness, and I don’t know if other people have self-awareness. I was horrified to see this: it is entirely possible that I am the only one in the whole world with self-consciousness, and everyone else is an inanimate thing pretending to be conscious!
When I gave a speech on semantic recognition in Chinese, I mentioned that using the semantic role model combined with the built-in knowledge base, the computer can distinguish the difference between "I have finished eating" and "I have finished eating apples", and can deduce that "the child has finished eating" most likely means what is. An audience member raised his hand and said, does the computer really "understand" the meaning of the sentence? My answer is, no offense, you think you can understand the meaning of a Chinese sentence, right, so how do you prove it? Listeners immediately understood. How do you prove that you really understand a certain sentence? You may say, I can expand or shorten it, I can express the same meaning in another sentence pattern, I can follow this sentence and tell stories and jokes related to this sentence. Or allusions, I can even draw the scene in the sentence on paper! Well, now a certain computer can do such a thing, what should I do?
This is called "functionalism": as long as its inputs and outputs behave like people, no matter what it is, no matter how it works, even if it's just a rock, we think it's intelligent. Never think that regularized and mechanized things have no intelligence. You think you can think of a random number in the blink of an eye, and laugh at the fact that computers can never generate truly random numbers. But why do you think the numbers you think are really random? In fact, what the number you think is actually generated by your brain machine step by step. Your brain can't escape the Turing machine.
======================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
_ And the accompanying (can be included but not required) language, emotion, etc. capabilities are people..
So... robots. Whether it is AI that passes the Turing test. Humans...are all human
beings with the same rights as those grown from fertilized eggs? Of course..just equality & human rights will always be a beautiful utopia for human beings..various discriminations..dictatorships..fraud.. Violence. It is estimated that it will not completely disappear after 100 years of AI passing the Turing test..
View more about Ghost in the Shell 2.0 reviews
