As far as the riot I witnessed, there was not a single fart in the media. I actually understood it. The reason is the same as the hijacking incident a few days ago. Although the official said it, I always wondered if the flight from another city would be discussed. Get some more? And will it cause more practical problems? It can be a successful agenda setting for the media, but its predictable results are not what most people want to see. While exercising the fourth power, journalists also shoulder social responsibilities. The two are not so harmonious and unified.
M said to eliminate rumors and gossip and snoop on privacy, I prefer to believe that this is the word she used in a moment of excitement. Information itself does have the ability to correct errors, that is, use the truth to eliminate rumors. But human nature determines that we prefer sensational information. Good news does not go out and bad news travels thousands of miles. Therefore, the biggest sales in the UK are "The Sun" instead of "The Times". As for privacy, I just want to say that the privacy of celebrities can often be regarded as a kind of information for public reference.
The plot of the first episode is as neat as a textbook. Yes, if you can't interview the person involved, go to the onlookers, parents, friends, three aunts, and six women's primary school teachers. It's a classic. The small editing room seems to control the world. Yes, you can always find key people with just one phone call, and the flirting and flirting every second is even more envious of the diaosi that I wait for running every day and sweating profusely. It was only after watching the Watergate incident that I truly admired those two people and waited with vague hope to the brink of madness. This is the real state of most reporters.
As for American news programs, everyone who has watched them knows that without their own unique views, neither side can be offended, and there is no such thing as high ratings! The political talk show is even more scolded and more popular, so I don't understand why this TV series is trying to criticize it? It's really Don Quixote.
If you see some complaints about the domestic media, please spit on the ideas. It has been at least ten years since the establishment of the first local Taiwan people's livelihood news column in mainland China. Another example is some events, the so-called mainstream media, newspapers and TV stations, of course you will not see them, but you will know it without much effort after all. People who only watch news broadcasts these days will definitely be regarded as fools and idiots. Five hairs. Everyone knows the influence of China's online public opinion dissemination, and there are so many criticisms. However, there are still people who pretend to be confused and shout on the Internet every day as if their family only receives CCGV and can only subscribe to the party newspaper. Wash and sleep, this is not the era of Edward Morrow, and there are many JYs who are famous for their reputation.
View more about The Newsroom reviews
