I approve and disapprove.
Agree, it is a good thing if communication can achieve mutual understanding.
Everyone understands what the other party wants, so they can satisfy each other and be considerate of each other. That's a good thing.
But what if you can't communicate.
Our common way of communicating now is talking. But I think many people have encountered this situation, the other party does not want to speak, or does not want to listen, or does not understand, or does not understand.
What about this?
There are levels of intelligence and emotional intelligence among everyone.
You recite poetry, he doesn't understand. If you want to speak the vernacular, you can only rely on others.
Or, in layman's terms, the language barrier.
There may be other misunderstandings.
I go my own way, chickens talk to ducks, and cows talk about the piano, out of context, and hard-hearted.
These are barriers to verbal communication.
Then, you have no choice, stop talking, give up impatiently, and let him fend for himself until the result is out of control.
If you have a brain, take a detour and use some tips and tricks to communicate. But that is too wasteful and too brain-consuming, and it is not something ordinary people can play.
Empathy is a good way, but to put yourself in your shoes requires experience and similar experience. Not everyone can do it. For example, it is impossible for a reporter to pretend to be an engineer out of thin air.
I don't think there is a way in the world that everyone can communicate completely.
There will always be misunderstandings, which can be solved with good luck, and unsolved with bad luck.
View more about City Island reviews
