Then the thief saw the girl who took the photo sticker, so he followed the girl, and wanted to soak in her, so he came to the tavern all the way, and collided with the girl, and stole the girl's mobile phone and the photo sticker that he just took ( Further proof that I want to pick this girl). Just when the little thief was having fun with the flower girl, the old thief appeared and interrupted the little thief. Here are a few shots that are a little confusing, but give us the facts for sure!
One is that the old thief heard that the little thief picked up the girl's cell phone, so he got up and shook hands with the little thief, and the two hands that shook hands were close-up, although only for a few seconds. This is the only time the two people in the shot have physical contact, and this is the only possible time, when the old thief stole the little thief's wallet keys and stickers.
The second is that there are several shots of the old thief's ring, one of which is also a close-up of a very short girl and the old thief's fingers, and the other is that the old thief extinguishes the cigarette and prepares to give the little thief cash, then only after this close-up, The little thief stole the old thief's ring, which is when the old thief gave the little thief cash.
The third is that the old thief gave the thief only one (or two) banknotes, but later there was a close-up of the money on the bar, which was a dozen banknotes, and the thief frowned and put the bar at the bar. The money was taken away, so the little thief not only stole the old thief's ring, but also the old thief's money.
A few guesses. . .
1. Are the old thief and the little thief father and son?
This question is hard to say. The evidence to support the father and son is that the thief talked about his encounter with his father at this bar before. The old thief forced the thief to sit down. The old thief asked the thief if they had met before, and the old thief also touched Touch the thief's face. Especially the part where he touched his face, he seemed especially loving and had to be suspicious.
The evidence against it is that the thief had a wedding ring and the girl said he was trying to steal the thief from his wife. And the father and son did not recognize each other at all. . . Or surprised.
I personally prefer not to be a father and son. If it is a father and son, it really doesn't make sense to wear a wedding ring, because the thief clearly stated that his mother has died and a man whose wife has died came out to hook up. There is really no reason to wear a wedding ring. And from Niu'er's words, the old thief still cares about his wife very much, so it is even more difficult to explain, unless the old thief is really obsessed with his deceased wife to a certain level.
2. The photo that the thief put in is different in size from the photo that he took out later?
Yes! Comrades! The photo the thief put in was obviously one size smaller, and the photo spat out from the mailbox was very large! This really doesn't make sense. I think the photo put in here is the same one that was kicked out. The reason, the intention is that the little thief first put in the photo because he didn't pay attention to the photo at all. He didn't realize that it was the person in the photo just now (the hairstyle and color were very different), until he finally kicked out this photo, he suddenly realized that this girl is the photo I just put in, and, it turns out I stole from this old man in the first place. As for why the sizes are different, I personally tend to wear gangs. Although it is a big director, in such a short period of time, the possibility of errors cannot be ruled out. What's more, it seems that small-sized photos are difficult to spit out of the mailbox (this is of course It's purely a random guess by the landlord).
3. The little thief was finally stopped by the girl, and the two were together while playing basketball? !
It's also hard to explain why there is this sudden turn at the end, especially when playing basketball, the thief seems to have spent money to hire a bunch of buddies to make himself stand out, and the girl is still enjoying it. One possible theory is that this represents a girl She realized that they were both thieves, and in the end she chose the younger and more energetic thief, rather than the old thief with a wife. . . . Of course, this explanation is far-fetched.
In the end, LZ wanted to talk about some suspected piercing shots. The first thing that LZ thought was problematic was the two thieves shaking hands. One second before the camera, the old thief's right hand was holding a cigarette butt, and the next second of the handshake was close-up. His right hand was already held. And no cigarette butts. . . . This is suspected to be wearing a gang, and we have to wait for a discerning person to see it.
The second is that the old thief actually took out the girl's head sticker from the inner pocket of the coat, took out the little thief's wallet from the pocket of the trousers, and kept the stolen things in different places. The main thing is that there was no footage before. The thief's hand reached into the inner pocket of the coat. Of course, you can interpret it as the thief is too fierce, and in the process of no one reacting, the god has not been unknowingly changed. .
In short, Jiang Wen incorporated a lot of details and hints in this short paragraph, such as many short and fast close-ups, and forced Chinese elements. . . Overall it's still very good. LZ is still more inclined to be non-father and son, it is purely a story of a married old thief and a mistress, and the old thief realized that the thief after hearing that the girl's mobile phone was picked up (plus his wallet was stolen and he looked a little familiar) is a thief! So I shook hands and forced to sit down. The reason why I asked if I had seen it was because I bumped into it before. The old thief planned to teach the little thief a lesson, so he stole the little thief's things. In order to retaliate, the thief stole the ring and the money again. He planned to leave the money on the table, but he heard that the old thief also took the sticker, so he took the money away. Finally, the old thief realized that the ring was stolen and threw it again. Get the key for the ring.
But Jiang Wen, since you want to play with the details, you still have to play it more reasonably and smoothly. The final turning point, the photos are of different sizes, and it is difficult to explain several suspected piercing shots, and once the thief is involved, it is not possible to use common sense. To explain, you can say that the thief is really powerful, and he stole it instantly under the camera, and the details of how to steal it can only be understood if the actor can't act it and the director can't shoot it. But with a film that makes bullets fly, it's not surprising that Jiang Wen released this kind of thing, and in such a short time, it's difficult to ask for everything to be reasonable~
PS: The little thief is handsome enough, but he complained, Hayden's French accent sounded suffocating. .
View more about New York, I Love You reviews
