Some vindicators are always pretending

Leo 2022-03-24 09:02:00

The goal of the company is to make a profit. In the film, the company has developed a treatment method that allows the dying of organ failure to continue to live--transplanting artificial organs. But there is no doubt that there is a cost to manufacturing artificial organs (the price is not given in the film, but the price is undoubtedly high), and the company also hopes to make a profit (if there is no profit, why does the company exist? The reason why a company is a company is that its essence is for continuous profit). If a person's organ dies, he should die, but he doesn't want to die, so he chooses organ transplantation, buys expensive artificial organs, and chooses to continue to live. But the people who deserve to die must have to pay a price to survive, and the price is just money. If you can live forever without paying money, which dying person in the world is willing to die? If everyone dies and refuses to pay, who will pay for the survival of the business? If an enterprise develops such high-end technologies that can help human beings and cannot develop profitably, who would continue to engage in scientific research for the future of mankind? If buying artificial organs costs money, is it wrong to repay? I can't pay the money. Is it wrong for the company to recover its own assets?
The more advanced the technology, the greater the desire of people. In primitive society, it was very, very rare for human beings to live until they were forty or fifty years old, but now that they live longer and longer, people start to be more greedy. People on the verge of death deserve to die, and a company gives them a choice to trade money for their lives, and they greedily choose to stay alive. Maybe they didn't have enough money, so the bank came along and offered to give them a loan to help them survive, so they greedily went to the bank to borrow money. Where do companies and banks go wrong? Some people may be discussing that the government should help, but no one has thought about it. From the background of the film, if a person can't even make money for artificial organs, how can you expect that small part of his salary? Can the tax burden cover the government’s spending on artificial organs at public expense? There are so many people who don't want to die, so many people who want to enjoy life, and so many people who don't make money but want to eat delicious food. Who should the government choose to help for free, and whom should it choose not to help? Should companies and governments be charities, then who will donate to them? Every second in the world, there are thousands of people who need artificial organ transplants at the same time. If the organs are free, and if the transplants don't cost money, which of them should be saved and which ones should be given up? Who should pay for this cost? Human nature is always selfish and delusional that there is a free lunch. If lunch is not free one day, no doubt, the person who sells lunch will have a bad conscience. Thousands of years ago, human beings did not cover their bodies and could not eat enough. Nowadays, with the development of society, science and technology, and economic development, people today can wear beautiful clothes, eat sweet food and live in beautiful and tidy houses. As a result, people are still I feel dissatisfied with swearing, I feel that my life is being exploited, I think that people with more power, more wealth and fame than me are taking advantage of me, I feel that I am the most miserable person, I am being exploited by society, and the ugliness of human nature is at a glance. No surplus.
Finally, just imagine that when the so-called artificial organs in this movie are not invented, or invented and not sold, the damned people still have to die, maybe there will be no moral immorality that the vindicator said. Or, human beings still exist as a single individual, not as a whole and a society. We have no technology, no economy and no country. Is that what the guardians hope to see the most in the pure land?

View more about Repo Men reviews

Extended Reading
  • Milton 2022-04-23 07:02:20

    Points for the ending

  • Ryleigh 2022-03-25 09:01:09

    I've only been able to see B-grade movies lately

Repo Men quotes

  • Remy: [from trailer] Take me out of the system.

    Frank: Give me your fucking heart!

  • Jake: The Repossession Mambo? Sounds kinda fruity!