------------Spoilers---------------------- ----------
The director continued to exert tension from the beginning: Was the protagonist wrongly imprisoned? Why plan a prison escape? How many people are helping him? Did the heroine get up a little bit at first? (Oh, sorry for leaking out the nature) Why is it like jumping off a building? Why wipe fingerprints? (Speaking of why there are no fingerprints left when the hand opens the window? Could it be that the material of the window sill will not be left or what is the reason)
Next, as the plot becomes clear, the focus of the audience has been subtly shifted from suspense to Others are above: Can the beautiful and cool man successfully steal the gem? Will the male protagonist finally jump down? Will the SWAT catch him? There were endless battles of wits and bravery for a while, good people and bad people came one after another, funny dialogues and yellow jokes were constantly being released, and the breasts and buttocks of sexy beauties filled the entire screen (oh medicine can’t stop) In
the end, the final male protagonist did not live up to the audience’s expectations and jumped up , grab the bad guy and find out the gems to make a comeback. Seems like the finishing touch to the whole movie, the perfect twisty ending. The audience happily threw away the popcorn, hugged the girl, said "I've thought of it for a long time", and left the stage happily.
Here comes the problem, and it's a huge one: what the protagonist needs is for the public to see that the gem is not in his hands but in the hands of the real estate tycoon to show his innocence. The big selling point in the middle of the film and the most exciting and twists and turns of the scene become unreasonable: rushing into the vault to steal the gem. Because everyone ignored the initial plan to steal the gem, but with the director's pace, the thinking followed the route of the gem - being discovered - the gem being captured - the protagonist's halo - recapturing the gem. Think again: the gem is not the purpose of the protagonist. Let's assume the cool boy and girl group managed to steal the gem, and then what? To the public: You see, we stole the gem, so the gem wasn't on us before! ! How credible is this statement? The real estate agent only needs to say coldly: "Oh, the thief obviously put the gems in his pocket in his pocket for makeup, and then took it out." Then he poured black water on the way and said that they actually took my other valuable things. ! The protagonist's family of three, oh no, and his father, who suddenly appeared for a perfect ending, went to prison to die.
The director obviously thought of this and subtly increased the twists and turns of the plot while diverting the audience's focus, making a completely unreasonable plot into "Oh, it's ok, it's quite thrilling."
So this movie is left in my eyes: 1. Crowds are very easily instigated by a small group of people. 2. The idea of stealing things will never be exhausted with the progress of the times. 3. The supporting actress is really a classic Latin beauty, really (oh I finally got it under control) dignified, conservative and restrained.
View more about Man on a Ledge reviews
