Correct name

Anyone who says the movie isn't good or has loopholes doesn't understand it. First of all, the main theme of the film is very classic. It can be said that half of the credit is due to the soundtrack, which pushes the plot to a climax again and again (especially the soundtrack of the missionary of Dushi Gun that perfectly interprets the choice between good and evil). Perhaps the shooting technology and the degree of sophistication are slightly less. There are deficiencies, but the overall performance is not weak. Secondly, most people who criticize it focus on why the protagonist does not kill the informant MM, whether he is not smart enough or the screenwriter. . ? In fact, it is not. This is exactly the deepest meaning in the film: once it is said that the protagonist has experienced a choice between good and evil, and has already killed the culprit, and has no intention of committing murder, he will let her go. Second, even if the protagonist has not let go, after all this, is he still obsessed with revenge? Who is the source of hatred in his heart? People's various behaviors and obsessions are determined by emotions, and the emotional changes of the victims may not be as understood or imagined by the viewers. Furthermore, you are just using rational logic to reason that the protagonist should hate the informant the most (let alone whether the screenwriter explicitly mentions the informant many times in the film, will he forget her at the end), but emotionally, the protagonist may not think so, and the informant also It is just to provide information, and it is the police officer who plans everything in the end (as for whether her behavior means betrayal, this is not what the protagonist cares about the most. The phrase "I Will Kill All..." shows that what he really hates is participating in the killing of him. The gang of brothers who acted). Personal understanding: In the end, after he experienced all kinds of good and evil choices, the hatred has dissipated in his heart, and only the deep mourning for the deceased brother and the enthusiasm for the new life are left. Even if the protagonist really doesn't realize the existence of the informant, it can be explained: he may not be so suspicious just from a photo, and in the end he has no intention to investigate. Regardless of whether the director and screenwriter made such deep consideration, at least we should be able to see it from the film. So what's the reason to call it a bad movie?

View more about Faster reviews