It's been a long time since I watched a movie. Occasionally go to the cinema to see the new blockbusters, which are nothing more than a few fixed story modes and then some scenes, complexes, various sounds, lights and shadows. Occasionally there are some good ones, and after reading them, they will lead people to think about something.
This night and early morning, I watched two movies. In the first, Hemingway said, "Any work is a good work, as long as it is clean and sincere." While watching the second part, I remembered this sentence.
two.
It is often felt that the synopsis of a movie is a utterly boring thing. The plot is just the plot, it is just a superficial thing, it is just packaged or grown naturally from the inside. And the core of the film, that is, what it wants to express, is far more than what the plot can describe. Describing a movie with a plot is as ridiculous as the Chinese teacher in elementary school asking to write the main idea and the main idea of the paragraph. The real thing cannot be said, and once it is said, it has been distorted or restricted to some extent. The original intention is a more open space, you are in it, you are infected by it, and then you understand.
In a sense, I feel that in terms of expression, dynamic images are more expressive than static images, and images are higher than words and language. Images are inherently more powerful. When we say that a text is good, we often say that it is full of pictures. A better word is that you're in there, it's like experiencing it firsthand. You are the protagonist, you have gone through everything it describes, it has a wonderful fit within you, and you enter it.
Of course, these comparisons are to extract the expressor. The existence of the person who expresses it is already the most powerful expression. It's just that the range that the expressor can convey is limited, while images and words can be disseminated through various channels. This is a very wonderful thing, although it may distort the most essential thing, because everyone sees it from a different angle and feels different. As the sixth patriarch Huineng said, "Truth has nothing to do with words, truth is like the bright moon in the sky, and words are just fingers pointing to the moon. The fingers can point out the location of the bright moon, but the fingers are not the bright moon, nor is it necessary to see the moon. It has to be through the fingers."
This is a matter at another level, and the principle is the same. What I'm trying to say is that I can't make any interpretations of a film like this, or, at all, make any comments. All I can say is feel.
three.
I have always had no resistance to documentaries, because they are so undisguised and straight to the heart. What's more, this is a movie produced by tens of millions of ordinary people UGC, from all over the world, on July 24, 2010, 80,000 videos, 4,500 hours, and the last edited more than 90 minutes, different skin colors, different languages, different lives state is a complete process. From early morning to late night, life is going on.
When couples say I love you to each other in the early morning, when a little Japanese boy puts incense to his mother with a blank face, when a Korean on a bicycle overlooks the Kathmandu valley at the Monkey Temple, when an American girl looks at a computer and shares a relationship with her in Afghanistan When the husband who participated in the war was chatting on the video screen, when the boy with a swollen nose from crying said that he did not dare to love deeply because he was afraid of losing it, when the man guarding his wife's hospital bed said that he had nothing to fear anymore. I watched and cried.
Crying does not mean sadness or sadness, it touches the heart. There are also knowing smiles.
Four.
That's how we live day after day, with love and fear.
That's how we live day after day, loving a little bit to dispel our fears.
The world is not big, and a day is not long. The world is big and the day is long. Mind your own happiness.
View more about Life in a Day reviews
