At first glance, I was attracted by the poster of the
film, and the tone of the film and the atmosphere in the early stage were all well done.
But the setting of the story is not beautiful.
Looking through the comments of "Shutter Island" again, the protagonist is S, the protagonist is alive and his speeches...even a few groups of people can fight.
Unexpectedly, this movie is the same.
In the end, the plot was smashed, and it was not clear whether the female pig was S or alive.
It seems that Rebecca has acted in more films in the past two years...
It turns out that I really don't like her appearance, and she has shown her face in many films, such as "Dorian Gray", "Robber in the City", "Midnight in Barcelona But", etc. I feel that appearance A bit dull, not interested in anything.
But after watching this film, I suddenly felt that this female temperament is suitable for historical dramas.
It's about 1921. The girl pig stands in such a nostalgic background, and the costumes are really balanced and appropriate, and it feels like she is suitable for acting.
First of all, Bilge is a ghost hunter and writer who goes to school to hunt ghosts.
The female pig took the train through the lush forest and arrived at the dilapidated school by the lake. The scenery and colors of this road are really touching. I really like it.
When I first met Maud, the school nanny, and Tom, the little boy, I felt that there was something wrong with these two people at the end.
It may be that I have watched too many films of this type, and I guessed a little at the beginning.
The little boy's temperament is too melancholy, and his facial features are too correct, and at a glance, he knows that he is the main character.
When the girl arrived at the school, she set up all the organs to ambush and waited for the ghost to automatically send it to the door. Later, she was led by the ghost to the room. There was a small model that looked like a school in the room. This scene was quite nervous.
In short, all the adults that Bunny has come into contact with in this school are abnormal.
Here, the screenwriter deliberately confuses us and begins to make us doubt all of us.
In fact, the most problematic person is the female pig herself.
Things became clear later.
I just don't understand why that person named Judd, who may be a school worker, said: "What should be paid attention to is not the dead, but the living." I don't know what the meaning of this role is.
Until he finally attacked the female pig and was finally beaten by the female pig with the handle of a gun, he didn't know what this character was doing.
It feels like the writers have confounded the audience.
Please someone inform.
Before the school holiday, all the details of all the films are to strengthen the psychological horror of the viewers.
All are foreshadowing for the later episodes.
After the school holiday, the little bunny doll that the girl pig found in the cubicle was the key reveal, which echoed the truth suggested later. Tom was very frightened when he saw the rabbit, and said, "He's coming to catch me!" But the girl pig didn't remember what happened before.
It seems likely that the nanny Maud put it there on purpose, trying to guide the female pig to recall the past.
And the ghost that the girl sees is not a little boy but a man holding a gun and shooting himself.
Many people see this and don't understand anything.
But I don't know why the girl pig had the thought of having sex with the history teacher Mallory in a situation where she should be very scared after developing the photo... It's really shocking. This is a failure!
It was only from Mallory's mouth that it turned out that the school was on holiday, there were only three people, and there were no little boys. Only then did I know that Tom was the ghost of that child.
But little Tom was not frightening from start to finish.
The truth is revealed: It turns out that this school is the home where the female pig lived in the past, no wonder I am very familiar with the paintings hanging here.
Bilge's father shot and killed her mother in the house and was holding a gun to kill her. The girl pig and the maid (aka the nanny Maud) and her father's child, Tom, are hiding in the toy house. The Bunny accidentally flips the button on the toy bunny, the bunny plays music, and the father finds them and shoots the house, but hits Tom. Because she was blocked by Tom, the female pig was not S.
It's still the same old plot: the protagonist has been greatly stimulated before, and the psychological defense mechanism is activated, so that he forgets this past. It's very similar to Shutter Island.
Later, the nanny Maud drank the female pig with poisonous wine, only to find out that it was the nanny Maud and Tom who lured the female pig to the school for investigation. Only the female pig went to the underworld to accompany Tom, and Tom would not swim in this school. Swinging around, scaring other little pot friends. This explanation is really a bit far-fetched.
In the end, little Tom crossed the room to get the antidote for the girl pig, and it was incredible. Because the ghost should not be a physical existence, he cannot touch any physical objects. It is understandable that the small room and the decorations used to be scary were not made by Tom, but for the nanny.
This, unlike all ghost movies, confuses us.
Personally think that female pig is S.
Judging the last principal and the male pig, I don't think the female pig will survive.
Finally, the principal said: I feel sorry for the dead nanny Maud, thinking that the nanny's death was because he couldn't bear the S of the children in the school and committed suicide by taking poison, but he commented on the female pig like this (I think this sentence is about the female pig, not the nanny ): "We will tell the children that her death was an accident, and the children adore her so much."
As the nanny introduced to the children earlier, the girl pig is the smartest person in the UK.
Moreover, the male teacher who was with the headmaster also said, "That woman named Cathcart is useless..." Although she didn't know who Cathcart was, because the girl pig's name had always been Florence. I don't know if it's a translation error? Because my English is not good. But when it came to this sentence, it was obvious that the female pig looked back at the person who was speaking. Here, it can be concluded that others are talking about her.
When the nanny Maud first saw the female pig, he said, "I have not seen a woman with a higher education." When the principal received the female pig in front, he said, "Great, an
educated woman."
At the end, the principal said again: "Women just can't get higher education."
Finally, the female pig meets the male pig.
The male pig reminded the little boy Victor who appeared earlier in the film to tie his shoelaces, and the camera also gave this close-up: the boy said hello to the female pig. This makes many people suspect that the female pig is alive.
In fact, the nanny Maud said earlier that only lonely children can see Tom, the dead boy, because of asthma, all children do not play with him, because of loneliness, seeing Tom's ghost was scared to death . The boy Victor is also very lonely. When the female pig in front was visiting the canteen, she saw him bring the meal to the table, and all the children spread out and did not sit with him.
So, I don't think it's an exaggeration that Victor saw the ghost of a female pig.
But when Tom's ghost faces the female pig, his little face is so cute; when he faces other children, why can't he control it? Don't distort your face, so you won't be scared to death. Tom also said earlier that he can control his image, but it doesn't take long...and he also leaves a way out for scaring people...this screenwriter.
I would rather think so, cute and kind little Tom, certainly not willing to scare other little friends to death.
I still think the girl pig died in the end.
There are many loopholes in the plot... The screenwriter and director want the film to be like "Shutter Island", with an open ending, you can guess, but the story is not as rigorous as "Shutter Island", it's just deliberately confusing.
One star for the tone of the film, the little boy Tom is so cute must add. Consider Samsung.
View more about The Awakening reviews
