bad special forces

Darian 2022-11-14 06:49:31

The French have always prided themselves on being romantic. Perhaps this also shows in disguise that they are really not suitable for making a military-themed movie. It may be better to leave it to a Hollywood director.
Talk about the plot and inadequacies in the film, personal opinions. First of all, although each of the six-person squads on the mission can compete with ten, they are bound to face a large number of enemies when carrying out such a mission. After all, they are deep behind the enemy. And a very important point of rescue is that it requires covert action, try not to alert the enemy. In the film, they just observed the terrain very briefly, the specific number of people in the place is not clear at all, and if a covert operation is required, it should be best at night. Because they have night vision equipment and the enemy does not. However, they only entered the enemy camp recklessly during the day, and the only remarkable thing in this step was the sniper. Second, the snipers were left behind when they were spotted retreating by the enemy. Although I am not a military madman, I still have basic military common sense. How can the person in the rear be a sniper? Fortunately, the sniper managed to retreat, and while covering him, I don't understand why the three of them stood up together and fired at the enemy. Is this a display of personal heroism? Still so majestic? Or they refer to those classic Chinese war movies. You must know that the probability of everyone being hit on the battlefield is equal, although it is related to marksmanship, especially when there is no cover. After repelling the enemy, the eight people continued to retreat, and the disaster happened at this time. As a special force with amazing combat effectiveness, it is extremely important not to lose contact with the rear, no rear, no support, no rescue operations without intelligence is sad. They actually have problems with communication, which is extremely inappropriate. To say that a second-rate army can be forgiven, but unfortunately they are not. Continue to follow the plot. In the encounter in the village, a few people should behave ok, especially when retreating, a few people cross cover and retreat, which is still very military common sense. Speaking of which, the audience should have noticed that each of them had grenade launchers on their rifles, but no one fired a single grenade from start to finish. It's a waste to deal with a single grenade, but they blocked a group of bases on the hillside. Wouldn't it be better to use a grenade when molecular? Or maybe they don't have grenades at all, so aren't the grenade launchers just a decoration, just to attract the audience? When the squad retreated, although it was very nervous, setting up a few mixed grenades should easily stop the pursuit. Don't everyone have grenades equipped? And what depresses me the most is that the two rescue helicopters were only raided. The most embarrassing thing is that they didn't fight back after being attacked. The helicopter should have a basic self-defense machine gun. It helped myself and the rescue team. detachment. Well, having said so much, there is only one purpose. The poster of the film is really tempting, but the content is too stupid! ! !

View more about Special Forces reviews

Extended Reading

Special Forces quotes

  • Tic-Tac: One hour of glory beats an eternity of anonymity.

  • Victor: Leave me. Leave me here.

    Kovax: Sure, when you stop breathing.