In short, I don't think this counts as a movie, but as a set of well-made, high-speed, soundtrack slideshows. The director plans to save trouble, simplifying the annual July 15th into a segment with an average length of 5 minutes, and then piecing together 20 small segments to make a movie. All the hero and heroine have to talk about it, and it is difficult to express. Feelings are lost in this simple and crude splicing process. All I can say is that this kind of cleverness is too insincere, not only insincere, but also the risk of screwing up. It's like you have the final exam tomorrow, but you can't do anything at 8 o'clock tonight, and you haven't been to class for a semester. At this time, a more rational and normal person's approach is not to start from scratch with a book, but to compare the answers. Do the test questions from previous years several times to figure out the rules. As for what content and type of questions will be tested tomorrow, you can only leave it to fate. There are usually only two kinds of results. One is that you are unlucky, you didn't do the question last night, and you can't do anything, so you can only fail the test; I'm too lazy to think about it, the questions are the same type as in previous years, but the number is changed, so you pass with a high score without any effort, not only that, you also have to snicker in your heart, the classmates next door are learning hard hahaha For a semester, go out early and come back late in the library every day. The final score is not even as good as yours. According to my personal experience, the ratio of these two possibilities is about 8:2, that is to say, you take 5 courses this semester, but you do not learn anything when you go to the club and fall in love every day, and the final exam will probably be able to Pass one door and waste 4 doors. Specific to this movie, it unfortunately falls into the first case. Not just this movie, I dare say that all directors who try to go the minimalist route will fail in the end. Because making a movie is not an exam, you get five points if you answer one question correctly, and if you are lucky, you will get an A+ in 90% of the questions. A movie is an emotional thing and cannot be quantified. A good story may give you a passing score; a reliable director will use more beautiful movie language to take it to the next level: for example, a good narrative Structure, reasonable rhythm, and well-tuned actors; more meticulous directors will also pay attention to technical aspects, such as shot scheduling; masters are good at creating atmosphere and rendering emotions in movies, but they are also very emotional. The difference is that movies with a score of eight or more have a feeling in them, which can drive the audience's emotions. This is a gradual accumulation process, there is no shortcut to copy, any opportunistic behavior will be disgraced in front of audiences all over the world. Especially for such a heavy emotional component, the main
Finally, my friend Huang Dongdong was moved to tears while watching such a movie. In fact, I really want to tell her that this is not a "special bond", it's just sensational. Dog blood + expression + soundtrack, full of film skills, pure skills, it sounds cold and dishonest, you are just incited. But the fact is this, all the movies whose inner feelings are not strong enough to touch people will use this hand, from the Tangshan earthquake to the thirteen hairpins in Jinling, without exception. It's like some things can make you laugh from the heart, but when someone scratches you, you will laugh, but not because you think it's funny.
View more about
One Day reviews
