When Ross made the first phone call with the heroine, Ross actually wanted to die, because a mysterious force got in touch with the heroine on the phone. Her real-life personality was like a gardener who died later. What she said was depressive and withdrawn. She wanted to communicate with people and cry about her experience. It could be heard that her tone was very sincere at that time. When Ross contacted the heroine for the second time, under the unintentional influence of the heroine, she chose to kill her husband and build the body behind the storage room wall. This is the first reality change caused by this connection point. When Ross and the hostess talked on the phone for the third time, Ross told the hostess the fact of her murder, and her temperament and tone changed completely. She moved into her husband's apartment and claimed that no one cared about who was paying the rent. That was the first flashpoint for Ross from being weak, depressed and withdrawn to perverted. Of course, at this time, Ross had no reason to choose suicide by using the telephone line. . But according to the logic of the film, which is the first question I thought about, since Rose did not choose to commit suicide, the heroine asked the gardener about Rose later. Why did the gardener still say that Rose committed suicide later? So I think it might be a logical error in the movie.
Later, a series of facts told the audience that everything Ross had done in the past would affect the current facts of the heroine, including the death of the gardener and John, until the heroine was on the phone with Ross and scalded the heroine as a child, and the heroine appeared alive. Burning scars [Actually, I am still wondering if the heroine has a mental problem].
The heroine completely broke down and decided to resist after experiencing both mental and physical oppression, so she asked Rose to meet at the bowling alley [I don't understand this place, since it is two points in the past and the present, how can we still meet ], the woman's head planned to burn Rose to death in the bowling alley fire.
In the end, the finale broke out. Ross chose to take revenge on the heroine. After choosing to wait 30 years later and saving enough energy and strength to carry a big sword to kill the heroine, the heroine's HP was significantly higher than that of Mrs. Ross after 30 years. In a panic, she was stabbed in the thigh by her own fruit knife. Could it be that Mrs. Ross is using MP? ? But in the end, she was hung up with broken glass by the weak female protagonist when she was a child? ?
Regardless of the plot, I am interested in logic. The question is, since Ross wants to take revenge on the heroine, why did he choose to wait for 30 years, instead of directly KO the heroine as a child [just like Ross kidnapped John when he was a child and It seems easy to kill him.] Does she feel that she is invincible, and it is more enjoyable to PK with the heroine 30 years later? Or is it the director's determination and perseverance to express old lady Ross' revenge?
The second question, when the gardener was killed by Rose, the hostess asked John, and John said he didn’t remember, that is to say, the past changed the present fact, and John’s memory of the gardener disappeared. The question is why the hostess still Remember, is it because the heroine is the heroine? So I think assuming that the heroine's spirit is normal and the state she shows is real, is this the second logical error that the film may have.
After summarizing the above problems, I finally want to understand that this film is actually not the same thing as a horror cruise ship. There are many bugs in the time logic, which disturbs the audiovisual. The director's intention is to express that a woman who has become mentally ill because of domestic violence A spiritual excuse for murdering your husband, YES! Just an excuse.
In addition, I personally think that the director thinks that the British law and order in the 1970s seemed very embarrassing.
View more about Sweet Home Alabama reviews
