The movie is about the head of the bank, but the problem suddenly appeared. It was said that the head of the bank was the protagonist, and it was the protagonist who told everyone that the head of the bank was the first. How can what the protagonist say be used as evidence?
The problem of the head of the bank is very simple. It is not necessarily the first place. It is possible that the first place is the protagonist, but this old man must have a problem
and talk about the protagonist. The protagonist is not necessarily the first. So these waves of people were all found by the protagonist, so why did the Jew (baldy) kill the FBI? What does it matter? Do the Jews know the FBI? Is it impossible! If the protagonist is, then he has found at least 5 waves of people in total (group of 3, group of 2 stupid thieves, Miss Switzerland, FBI, Jews are outside the group of 3), an unarmed person, with It is a bit exaggerated that Wisdom wants to be obedient to these 5 waves of people. Some people will say that the protagonist is powerful, and others have this ability, so well, if the protagonist can, then where did the old man who framed the protagonist come from? ?
The first is the woman who is getting married? This kind of thinking is even bolder, because the first place has no role, so it can be assumed, but if this woman is the first, she has no time to put money in the game she set up herself. Isn't it an insult to the first place IQ?
The first didn't show up?
Probably, most likely this is it!
Closer to home, the simplest and most convincing explanation is: the director wants to be the old man first, but the director's level is not good, he didn't make it, that's all!
Personal opinion 1 Welcome to exchange!
View more about Flypaper reviews
