Existence is reasonable

Demarco 2022-03-24 09:02:25

Perhaps it is because he has been engaged in related work, so he knows that the truth only exists in the conscience of the recorder. From the point of view of a pseudo-practitioner, I can only say that I don't think it's so tenable.
In addition, I have also seen an equivalent substitution between "discourse power" and "hegemony".
First, Larry clearly did his homework before interviewing each subject, and he clearly had an advantage in the face of interviewees who were at a loss for what their purpose was.
Secondly, even if there are problems in the interviews in the early stage, there may be such a situation - after processing in the later stage, the "our side" has the upper hand, and the "enemy" has the upper hand and the "our side" is speechless. does not appear. This is also a common means of making video programs and documentaries.
Third, I don't think the documentary is very convincing. The film itself has a very extreme tone, although I can understand why the director chooses those paranoid, grotesque, and warlock-like ones for the sake of clarity of point of view, visual presentation, dramatic conflict, etc. interviewees, but at the same time, I don't think those people are mainstream among religious people. Among the religious people, I believe, there are a good number of people who are kind and friendly and willing to listen to others' opinions.
I have personally chosen to take refuge in Buddhism. When I chose to take refuge, I really wanted to do good and practice. But with the growth of time and the constant contact with religion, there are indeed many doubts deep in my heart. This is also the main reason why I choose to watch similar documentaries. However, in this documentary, I did not see some of the most essential things I wanted to see - the negative impact on human civilization, society and individuals, or should be said, these parts take up too little space. What I see is that Bill's insistence on "virgin birth" and "man and dinosaur at the same time" all sorts of minutiae, which greatly diminishes the meaning of the film itself.
In the end, I think that if the documentary "The Absurdity of Religion" is only talking about the absurd part of religion, it is understandable; but if its meaning is to say that religion is absurd, then I can only say that this is the real Absurd in the sense.
There is a saying, existence is reasonable.

View more about Religulous reviews

Extended Reading

Religulous quotes

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] What about when innocent people get killed during a "defensive action"?

    Michael Bray: I'm for that. Yeah. It's collateral damage.

    Bill Maher: But it's acceptable?

    Michael Bray: We've got to consider what the real issue is here and what the cost is and the risk.

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] This is the Anne Frank house, when you see it you really understand how true that phrase "The banality of evil" really is. One of the common arguments in defence of religion is that Hitler wasn't religious and neither was Stalin or Mao and they were bad so religion is good. But like religion itself it's an argument that really depends a lot on not thinking too deeply. For one Hitler himself didn't eliminate anyone personally he had a lot of footsoldiers most of whom were good Christians and they pushed people into the ovens. Religion has done a bad job of stepping up and preventing violence-prone bullies from doing their thing. If anything it usually justifies acts of madness. And 20th Century Fascism and Communism while not strictly religions as we've come to think of religion, really were religions. They were state religions. Hitler was seen as infallable and Godlike. Hirohito was absolutely a God on Earth to the Japanese people. We shouldn't get too hung up on the word religion. The bottom line is whether people think and act rationally or not and whenever they organise their lives around something that could best be described as groundlessness bad things happen. Even if the central story seems harmless like there's a God who loves you so much that he had his only Son whacked so that you could keep on sinning. Still, doesn't matter, once reality has left the building, once it's up there in the ether then anything can be extrapolated or tacked on by Preachers and Priesthoods and delusionals and power-hungry pricks. It's not that big a step from "your God is the only God and he loves you very much" to "you really should get out there and start killing for him" Whenever people believe in something utterly groundless because they were told it by a charismatic preacher and Hitler was nothing if not that, all bets are off. Nazism was a religion, a religion based on the insane fiction that Jews were subhuman vermin who did not deserve to live, but people and people not from a primitive society believed it because A they liked the preacher, B the other sheep around them were buying into it even though it was crazy and C it was inextricably tied to their view of a glorious Valhalla-like future. A, B, C. Religion.