Some people tell me that the performance should be natural, not to add too much design, and more importantly, to be natural. I agree with this point of view. The best performance may be the kind of spark that bursts out of the scene, the kind of desire that comes from the heart. The manifestation, the natural response. . . But this kind of nature is also based on a certain basic design. What to design, design is imagination, it may be very simple to say, but now actors may not be able to work so hard to do this work, let's say Bloom's simplest prescribed situation.
Here I would like to explain first. In the early stage, the sketches will be instilled with the word "prescribed situation", but gradually the work of the script is gradually ignored, and it is not just a transfer of not doing this work. Move on to other analysis of the script. Next, let's talk about Bloom.
A body design at the beginning, lying on his back on a chair to sleep, was woken up by the phone. It shows that the work was very hard before, and he also tried very hard, so he fell asleep in this position on the chair. Can the usual script be deduced like this? The characters have a life in front of them, and the most important thing is whether they can extract typical or more vivid life actions? There are prescribed situations, but how can we make the current performance A more vivid image requires the observation and refinement of life.
Then get up to answer the phone, coughing uncontrollably, which makes it seem like he's either sick or smoking too much. So he went to get the cigarette during the call, but the cigarette was already finished, and only the cigarette case was left. Fuck you, this proves that he was very busy with work and smoked a lot of cigarettes, and a very typical smoking action was caught by this Forced to use it, that is, when I found out that I finished smoking, I squeezed the cigarette case into a ball.
From small to big, how to further accumulate this typical action is very critical. Anyone who has studied mathematics knows that the same can be proved. The most damning thing is that each scene uses different, but the creative The method to achieve the result is the same. So after you learn it, you have to dig out everything that can be discovered in the script in this way. This makes the characters more vivid.
View more about New York, I Love You reviews
